Replies

I have no interest in writing “I told you so” later on.
If you think my posts shouldn’t be allowed, hit report abuse. Otherwise I will post when and what I think is true.
Posting stories like these, and commenting on then, will do absolutely nothing to make Trump POTUS on January 21st.(Unless you’re on his legal team)
You confuse negative with pragmatic, and positive with delusional.

I never said your comments shouldn't be allowed. Not once. You made it up, like fake news. You put YOUR words in my mouth.

What I did say is that comments like yours are not helpful when you're trying to win the WH.

No doubt you will continue your naysayer comments because that is your nature. But your comment was that "these stories make our side, and this site, look foolish." We're looking for a winning strategy, not a reason not to do something because the already hateful media might make us look bad.

Again, without having ever watched the video of someone who was actually in the four hour, contentious meeting with Trump and his advisors, you call the "story" foolish. It is a first-hand account of what happened. You're like someone who's never read the book but gives it a bad review anyway.

It might be helpful if you were to watch the video and see what the president is up against in his own WH and why we need to support him in doing what he thinks is the right thing to do, not some yahoo lawyers who are looking for their next job after they help him lose.

Being pragmatic doesn't preclude you from considering possible solutions and winning strategies. And nobody is delusional. When you're trying to win, you always know there is the possibility of losing. But being positive, gives you that chance you can win.

But being so pragmatic or negative by discounting the possibility of winning from the start without considering alternative strategies or tactics, automatically results in losing because you never give winning a chance.

I'm just sayin'.....

I never said your comments shouldn't be allowed. Not once. You made it up, like fake news. You put YOUR words in my mouth.

What I did say is that comments like yours are not helpful when you're trying to win the WH.

No doubt you will continue your naysayer comments because that is your nature. But your comment was that "these stories make our side, and this site, look foolish." We're looking for a winning strategy, not a reason not to do something because the already hateful media might make us look bad.

Again, without having ever watched the video of someone who was actually in the four hour, contentious meeting with Trump and his advisors, you call the "story" foolish. It is a first-hand account of what happened. You're like someone who's never read the book but gives it a bad review anyway.

It might be helpful if you were to watch the video and see what the president is up against in his own WH and why we need to support him in doing what he thinks is the right thing to do, not some yahoo lawyers who are looking for their next job after they help him lose.

Being pragmatic doesn't preclude you from considering possible solutions and winning strategies. And nobody is delusional. When you're trying to win, you always know there is the possibility of losing. But being positive, gives you that chance you can win.

But being so pragmatic or negative by discounting the possibility of winning from the start without considering alternative strategies or tactics, automatically results in losing because you never give winning a chance.

I'm just sayin'.....