Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
anti-Federalists and pro states rights

LOL. You say that like that is a bad thing Bro.

32 posted on 12/22/2020 3:00:41 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
central_va misquoting BJK: "anti-Federalists and pro states rights"

central_va: "LOL. You say that like that is a bad thing Bro."

No, but you misquoted -- Democrats were only ever "pro-states rights" when it served their own purposes.
Otherwise, they wanted to dictate national policy from Washington, DC.
Perfect examples are SCOTUS Crazy Roger Tanney's Dred Scott opinions on slavery, Southern Democrats' opposition to admitting Kansas & other territories as free-states, and secessionists' complaints about Northern fugitive slave laws.

The old Federalists were the people who wrote & ratified the new US Constitution in 1777-1779.
They were opposed by anti-Federalists who wanted to keep the weaker Articles of Confederation.
After ratification, most of the old anti-Federalists regrouped, becoming Jeffersonian Democrats and claiming to be "strict constructionists".

But it turned out, "strict construction" was only a weapon against Federalists -- once Democrats themselves came to power, they did whatever the h*ll they wanted, the Constitution be d*mn*d.

33 posted on 12/22/2020 5:32:00 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson