He probably should have typed “amidst” instead of “against.”
I wouldn’t make too much of it. He’s busy, and the president’s whole team is busy and probably getting only 4 hours of sleep a night.
He phrased something awkwardly. The people he read it to before posting aren’t getting much sleep either and didn’t pick up on the awkward phrasing. To them, it sounded fine because they know what they meant and were probably hearing and seeing it as saying they are fighting against the fraud, not against the evidence.
Think of how many times you read a Freeper’s comment and it didn’t make sense at first and then you figure out they probably meant a different word than the one they used.
ThankQ!
CheshireTheCat wrote:
He probably should have typed “amidst” instead of “against.”
I wouldn’t make too much of it. He’s busy, and the president’s whole team is busy and probably getting only 4 hours of sleep a night.
He phrased something awkwardly. The people he read it to before posting aren’t getting much sleep either and didn’t pick up on the awkward phrasing. To them, it sounded fine because they know what they meant and were probably hearing and seeing it as saying they are fighting against the fraud, not against the evidence.
Think of how many times you read a Freeper’s comment and it didn’t make sense at first and then you figure out they probably meant a different word than the one they used.