Replies

ransomnote~

ransomnote: If Barr admitted the CIA spied, he would have to say something to address why we didn’t see perp walks. Barr would have to say something like, “I couldn’t move against the pervasive infiltration while America was still asleep; 70% of the gov was bought out by enemies.”

“We had no borders; we had two “private” sovereign Chinese ports; Chinese/UN/other enemies on north and south borders; our military was gutted in terms of morale, infiltration, obsolete hardware and made with intentionally inferior steel ...from China.”

“We would fail to defend ourselves when the Cabal made its move if we didn’t delay while we awakened the public, restored America’s defenses and eroded the battle readiness of our enemies.”

Had Barr said the CIA spied = Barr either has to lay down all cards or say that the rule of law didn’t matter to anyone, including the DOJ.

But note that Barr says the Russia hoax was politicized - he can say that because he publicly ended it.

The NYT is working hard to frame Barr so that he has to choose between “CIA did no wrong”, which will be easily refuted later with Durham et. al., or “CIA spied and rule of law is not functioning now, unless it’s to protect certain people”.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The timing is interesting - the New York times “needed” to use Barr’s resignation “somehow.”

Barr’s answer will be used to portray him to conservatives as protecting the CIA, while telling the left that Trump and other’s (Admiral Rogers) assertions of spying were lies.

NYT and the rest of the Deep State media need Barr to be viewed as Deep State, so that when they try to flip the US to the Dark Side (coup, all black hats are declared white hats etc.), Barr’s knowledge of the Mueller Coup is invalidated, elevating Mueller, the Mueller Report’s claim that Trump committed treason, RR, Weisman, Strzok - all to “persecuted white hat status”.

So the NYT will now fan the “Barr is Deep State” pysop, but they had to trade something for that strategy. By answering as he did, Barr created a problem for the NYT because he underscored that Mueller’s investigation was a coup attempt.

I imagine the left will delete/erase the part of that interview it didn’t like, and all the world will hear is “Trump never had any evidence! He lied! etc.”

I didn’t read past the paywall, but I’m curious what else lurks there.