does his wife have bible study too?....(reference to Barr)
Yet another finger in God's eye.. And we'll pay for this one as well.. :(
Why not?
Look at the lying in the media, in H-wood, in voting?
Sooner or later we’re going to just disregard EVERYTHING coming from our inept, corrupt, and quite deserving of whatever happens to them gubmit.
My prediction is when the Biden collection of morons tries to take the guns.
Not gonna happen.
The gender's fine, but the birthdate is wrong. My inner ZOOKER is only 15 years old.
Kinda nonsensical, a birth certificate is a record of what they were at birth. Changing gender on it is rewriting history.
Its not factually or biologically correct.
Luke 17:26-30 NASB
The black robes are all in on this dangerous tranny nonsense. No doubt people will just stand by and let them do it like they have everything else.
That is a stupid idea. A person born as a man will die as a man and it is the same with women. It does not matter how much phoney surgery and hormone therapy you give them, they remain the sex they were born as. Judge Michael Watson is a kook!
Such an absurdity led to 44.
ML/NJ
China doesn’t have this problem for some reason. Guess who wins.
Just Eliminate Birth Certificates altogether
FOUR PEOPLE!!! Four people and the nation is bending over for these mentally ill sad people.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Consider that Virginia Minor's lawyer had argued, in Minor v. Happersett, that the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause (EPA) gave her the right to vote regardless that she was a woman.
H O W E V E R…
No only did the Supreme Court clarify that the states had never amended the Constitution, up to that time, to expressly give biological women at birth the specific power to vote regardless of EPA, but consider the following.
When the states later ratified the 19th Amendment to effectively give women the right to vote, that amendment limited the federal government's power to protect women to voting rights issues, birth certificate gender outside the scope of voting issues.
"3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had [emphasis added]." —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.
"19th Amendment:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
So the misguided, institutionally indoctrinated federal judge is not only wrongly legislating LGBT politically correct “rights” from the bench, but is also breaching the Constitution's division of federal and state government powers by stealing state powers to do so.
Consider that the Civil Rights act of 1964 and its associated titles are also mostly unconstitutional imo.
Ok, comply by placing a huge X across the male and put a note that says female amended xx/xx/xxxx
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Nothing in the article said anything about why it was ruled unconstitutional. I'm not asking for a full disertation - just a finger pointing at the article and section or amendment which makes it unconstitutional. Since the tenth amendment says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." and the power to register births is not delegated to the United States nor prohibited to the states, it looks like the state has full power on this.
Just ignore the judge.
It has to start
Ohio should just amend the certificates to read:
SEX: MALE
GENDER: WHATEVER
or
SEX: FEMALE
GENDER: WHATEVER
This is so silly.
My take... let them put whatever they want on the birth certificates for the newly redefined word “gender,” but also put the sexual chromosome makeup on the certificate... XX, XY, or the occasional XYY and XXY. And that shouldn’t be changed.
Okay, just add some checkboxes for what “physiological equipment” they’re born with.