Supreme Court rejects attempt to revive Kansas voter ID laws

Washington Examiner ^ | 12/14/2020 | Nicholas Rowan

[JoSixChip]

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid by Kansas Republicans to revive laws that require people to prove their citizenship before voting.

[Lumper20]

Our nation is damn sick. Eisenhower rounded up these wetbacks. Now, not only Hispanics, but all foreigners who break our immigration laws can vote. Most make no effort to assimilate. When we have all these LGBT types here GOD is not happy with America. Evil types like Biden take over.

[Lurkinanloomin]

The Supreme Court is endorsing the non-citizen vote.

They say it’s unconstitutional to uphold the Constitution.

[DaiHuy]

Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Not one of them is any better than John Roberts.

At least with Sotomayor, and Kagan you knew what you were getting.

[rollo tomasi]

"All election laws must be constitutional."

Article 1, Section 4, clause applies to Federal elections/State powers, which primarily was HOR elections for a while. Federal Congress can regulate, but State/local elections are wide open. For instance, several States allowed women to vote in certain elections long before the 19th Amendment. Heck, States were "disfranchising voters" left and right concerning the amount of property women owned or allowing women to vote who had school age children. Again wide-open due to the States having autonomy at the time. Now it's basically federalized with universal suffrage using case law and "interpretations"/Judicial equity such as the case in OPs article.