Posted on 12/15/2020 6:27:14 PM PST by JoSixChip
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid by Kansas Republicans to revive laws that require people to prove their citizenship before voting.
Yep! Supreme Court justices are now politicians. They do not rule on law. Remember what was right is now wrong!
“Rush floated a theory that the SC judges are acting in this manner to appease the dems in order to curtail the court-packing talk as not necessary because the existing justices have not sided with any republican election-related lawsuits.”
Except if the Court did it’s job and ruled correctly against the election fraud and Biden, there would be no court packing because Biden wouldn’t be President. Not much logic in Rush’s theory.
That’s why the Texas case against PA, WI, MI supposedly had “no standing.”
SCOTUS just didn’t want to get involved!!! They would have to follow the constitution and their oath!
“ Rush floated a theory that the SC judges are acting in this manner to appease the dems in order to curtail the court-packing talk as not necessary because the existing justices have not sided with any republican election-related lawsuits.”
Like that’ll work. Pffft.
It's all theatre and we are the people who are paying admission to the show. When the show is over, they all go to their cocktail parties together and have a good laugh at our expense.
Soon to be Everytown USA.
Try getting into the SC audience without IDnyet you can now vote without it. FUBAR!
Lawless Traitors
Rush is probably correct so that means if Schumer gets the majority in a few weeks are they just hoping that Chuck won’t look to add new judges cause that maybe a Republican thing to respect the law but Democrats could honestly care less if there’s 30 Supreme Court Justices just as long as they all vote the way they’re told
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;"
" If the States can admit to the elective franchise those who are not citizens, thereby neutralizing the votes of citizens, not only the Federal power of naturalization becomes a nullity, but" * * * * "a minority of citizens by the aid of aliens may control the government of the States, and through the States the government of the Union [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See near middle of 1st column.)
" Whatever difference there may be as to what other right appertain to a citizen, all must agree that he has the right to petition and also to claim the Protection of the Government. These belong to him as a member the body politic, and the possession of them is what separates citizens of the lowest condition from aliens and slaves. To suppose that a State can make an alien a citizen or confer on him the right of voting would involve the absurdity of giving him the direct and immediate control of the action of the General Government, from which he can claim no protection and to which he has no right to present a petition [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See bottom half of 1st column.)
Yeah, Kansas, tell ‘em to pound sand and do it anyway. States rights - isn’t that essentially what they gave as a reason for not accepting the Texas case?
The problem appears to be various state’s republicans never seem to put serious enforcement in place. During the election. By now they should have figured out if democrats are involved they need one trust-worthy volunteer militia member standing at the elbow of every one of them. And let them know any cheating is met with summary execution on the spot. It’s the only way to be sure.
Not exactly.
All election laws must be constitutional.
Who doesn’t have a birth certificate or too idiotic to procure their birth certificate?
Also, where in the Constituion gives the Federal government the power to prohibit States from verifying qualifications of legal voters reside at?
I imagine their USSC salaries are nothing compared to the real payoffs they get.
I have entertained that possibility as well.
Federalist Society Swamp Creatures were always ticking time bombs anyway as well.
#16. While you may not be able to “fight something BEFORE it happens”, you sure as hell can “ANTICIPATE” that action and prepare to react, counter, and legally destroy it.
Lesson Learned: Always be alert and PROACTIVE against the Left. If they can corrupt something, esp. the law, they will so we’d better be there to ambush and destroy them.
#26. Good photo of downtown Seattle, San Fran and LA, Portland, some of DC, Ferguson, West Baltimore, Minneapolis, Detroit, etc. Wonder why?
Perhaps you misread my post.
IF Texas is suing other states (with 20 other States signed on!!) is this not the biggest of “original jurisdiction” issue? If SCOTUS doesn’t hear this case - who will?!!!
Yes, by declaring “no standing” — SCOTUS cravenly and pathetically punted away their responsibility and reputation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.