Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PGR88

That’s why the Texas case against PA, WI, MI supposedly had “no standing.”

SCOTUS just didn’t want to get involved!!! They would have to follow the constitution and their oath!


23 posted on 12/15/2020 7:07:28 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: tallyhoe
Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers.

IF Texas is suing other states (with 20 other States signed on!!) is this not the biggest of “original jurisdiction” issue? If SCOTUS doesn’t hear this case - who will?!!!

Yes, by declaring “no standing” — SCOTUS cravenly and pathetically punted away their responsibility and reputation.

40 posted on 12/15/2020 8:57:03 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson