Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sevlex

“Sigh...”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Magritte

“Magritte’s work frequently displays a collection of ordinary objects in an unusual context, giving new meanings to familiar things. The use of objects as other than what they seem is typified in his painting,[20] The Treachery of Images (La trahison des images), which shows a pipe that looks as though it is a model for a tobacco store advertisement. Magritte painted below the pipe “Ceci n’est pas une pipe” (”This is not a pipe”),[21] which seems a contradiction, but is actually true: the painting is not a pipe, it is an image of a pipe. It does not “satisfy emotionally”—when Magritte was once asked about this image, he replied that of course it was not a pipe, just try to fill it with tobacco.”

Ceci n’est pas une pipe

Magritte used the same approach in a painting of an apple: he painted the fruit and then used an internal caption or framing device to deny that the item was an apple. In these “Ceci n’est pas” works, Magritte points out that no matter how naturalistically we depict an object, we never do catch the item itself.”

So, it is neither a “male appendage” or a “pipe”, but a picture.


1,015 posted on 12/13/2020 8:23:31 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 994 | View Replies ]


To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

It like analogies - all analogies must break down eventually, else they would be the thing they were analogous to.


1,273 posted on 12/14/2020 6:37:59 AM PST by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1015 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson