“Standing” is a court’s way of tell you to F’ off.
Maybe it would be easier if some person with legal knowledge could tell us who actually HAS standing in the case of election fraud. No one?
So, if someone shoots and kills someone else, can the defense claim that the prosecution has no standing because they were not impacted, and the victim is dead?
Robert Barnes
@Barnes_Law
FYI: the entire doctrine of “standing” was invented by courts this last century as a way to play preferential Pontius Pilate, washing their hands of cases they don’t want responsibility for.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dfbd/14305d0a07a25975a0960c3f297eddd42367.pdf
10:46 PM · Dec 11, 2020·Twitter Web App
https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1337604758576615425
“Maybe it would be easier if some person with legal knowledge could tell us who actually HAS standing in the case of election fraud. No one?
So, if someone shoots and kills someone else, can the defense claim that the prosecution has no standing because they were not impacted, and the victim is dead?”
That’s basically what these courts have all said.