Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Franklin

It’s possible that at least Alito and Thomas would vote in favor of hearing the case.

https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/12/11/two-supreme-court-justices-are-of-the-view-the-court-must-hear-cases-involving-disputes-between-states-are-there-five-n292833


56 posted on 12/11/2020 8:57:10 AM PST by RummyChick (I blame Kushner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
Thank you for the link. It is a good read and very informative. The fact is, much of what SCOTUS does is based on setting policy. In this case I believe they have a clear duty to act. I just saw an interview with Texas AG Paxton on Newmax. He noted that the reason for SCOTUS having original jurisdiction over disputes between states is that it was designed that way by the framers to avoid wars between the states. Recently, a Texas state legislator has filed a declaration of secession, and Rush is contemplating if the Blue and Red states are capable of remaining in one Union.

There are severe consequences if SCOTUS doesn't giver this a fair hearing. Even the liberal justices on the left may recognize the seriousness of election fraud and the effects of a stolen election. I am expecting oral arguments over the weekend.
60 posted on 12/11/2020 10:36:51 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson