Posted on 12/10/2020 5:55:08 PM PST by ransomnote
But we were talking about a brother-in-law’s brother, which can only happen with the person married to your sister.
*****************************************************************************
“brother in law’s brother”???
Well my “brother in law’s brother” was also my husband’s brother and also my brother in law and neither was married to my sister.
Perhaps the description is too general, at any rate my brain is too tired. So whatever you say-nuff said.
LOL. We also used the phrase “some sort of relative”. It’s a lot easier.
So , then. What kind of in-law is that guy? Or is he no in-law at all.
**************************
My family refers to those folks as our out-laws.
Couple thoughts about the SCOTUS decision:
LittleLinda:
Did we ever find out why PDJT and/or his team met with the USSC last week? I know there was some discussion about ex parte communications.
Maybe he gave them proof that there was interference by a foreign state and provided a copy of his EO covering this exact situation. I don’t remember the timing of that meeting versus the lawsuit events timeline, but this could explain why the Court asked for defensive briefs and then killed the suit a day or two later. They were inclined to consider the case until they learned about the foreign interference.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@RedRock1T
Replying to
@CodeMonkeyZ
Texas doesn’t have standing because the fraud was in collusion with foreign states making the fraudsters enemy combatants...
and therefore classifed and under military law not constitutional law.
see executive order on election interference.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My thoughts yesterday fwiw:
A thought just occurred to me about this SCOTUS ruling and applying gnerally.
For years, and I heard AG Barr give a speech about this quite some time ago, the judiciary has become MUCH too powerful. Instead of legislative action, people turn to courts, and judges have become bloated and power mad (my words, not Barr’s). The judiciary needs to resume their proper position in the balance of power between the three branches.
So maybe in the ultimate issue this ruling will actually help to pave the way for a less bloatedly powerful judiciary.
Hmm...that is a thought. Otherwise, why not just make an EO designating Dec.24 always a fed holidy? Hmm hmm. You have lots of brainz.
Could e anything in Delaware. Inbred capital of the east coast.
Trump got more votes in CO in 2020 than Hillary did in 2016 (and she beat Trump), but Biteme got even more than that? I just don’t buy it.
So, I question that Gardner lost, too.
I called the SOS, but the dude hung up on me. They work for the DNC, not us taxpayers.
LT does a good job of keeping his videos upbeat. You can tell he trusts the plan.
LT does a good job of keeping his videos upbeat. You can tell he trusts the plan.
I understood what you meant although it never hurts to be reminded.
Scotch Irish here.
Uncle is a term of endearment.
Under our culture you not he were correct.
Thanks, good info. The site looks (pre-revegetation) very much like a former oil or gas drill site, I see that shape and leveled scar look on aerials a lot. No word on size though that would have been easy to include. No LL coordinates so everyone could look at it either.
Typical.
Interesting. I can’t believe they are going to get away with this nationwide...so I don’t.
Professional wrote:
“Scotus denied based on standing not merit. Scotus is saying that they are not willing to agree that Texas has a right to another states compliance with their own laws. Scotus didn’t deny that any of the claims in the case were in dispute. The case simply needs to come back via a proper litigant.”
Good point!!
Drop 2980
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 29890e No.5537208 📁
Mar 6 2019 11:13:22 (EST)
https://nypost.com/2018/11/28/trump-threatens-to-declassify-devastating-docs-about-democrats/📁
Read carefully knowing what you know now.
Predictable?
Moves & Countermoves.
Death Blossom.
Q
ThankQ!
Absolutely!
.
.
COUNTrecount wrote:
“What if.....
Hiden/Biden was arrested?
Rudy tweeted a few days ago that he would like to charge him with RICO violations since he had the evidence.”
Now THAT would rock some folks’ world!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.