Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PK1991

One would think if they are under protective order the results are suspicious?


2 posted on 12/10/2020 11:21:02 AM PST by RBW in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RBW in PA
They're no doubt very busy...


3 posted on 12/10/2020 11:22:18 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Joe Biden: Barack Obama minus the pretty talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RBW in PA
county attorneys told him the examination of the tabulators would violate their licensing agreement with Dominion

Dominion is a tool of the dems.

Election machines and software should be Open Source.

4 posted on 12/10/2020 11:23:54 AM PST by Pollard (Bunch of curmudgeons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RBW in PA

Not surprisingly Dominion objected to release of any information because they have proprietary rights in the equipment. But you know if the results helped the left they would be all over the media. Leaks are a common practice for them even by the head of the FBI James Comey.


5 posted on 12/10/2020 11:23:59 AM PST by PK1991 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RBW in PA

Ya, but “the cybersecurity company says that the company is please with the results”


10 posted on 12/10/2020 11:33:40 AM PST by G Larry (There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RBW in PA
One would think if they are under protective order the results are suspicious?

No. This is standing operating procedure for evidence that involves intellectual property covered by a contract. A parallel example is that aircraft manufacturers hold all the information about the certification of the airplanes by the FAA -- the reason is to prevent ne'er-do-wells from using the Freedom of Information Act to gain proprietary information.

When the results of the tests are presented in Court, then they may become viewable, in whole or in part, by the public. That's up to the judge, based on the requests of the parties to the lawsuit(s).

12 posted on 12/10/2020 11:37:20 AM PST by asinclair (Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RBW in PA

Elsenheimer issued a protective order “restricting use, distribution or manipulation of the forensic images and/or other information gleaned”...

Unless there is more to the order than that, nothing would seem to prevent the examiners from characterizing their findings/interpretations, so long as they do not distribute “images” (i.e., digital copies of hard-drives, etc.) that reveal Dominion’s proprietary software. So, “what’s the holdup?” is an important question.


18 posted on 12/10/2020 12:48:40 PM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RBW in PA
"...examination of the tabulators would violate their licensing agreement..."

Ah, so their vulnerability to fraud is "intellectual property"?

American's right to free and fair elections have no standing?

22 posted on 12/10/2020 3:17:48 PM PST by G Larry (There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson