[RandFan]

I’m listening to it now..

He is going through the remedies for the President and the Texas case. He thinks this is the best shot as “rogue states” have violated the constitutional compact.

[SkyPilot]

Thanks.

It's obvious by now that no one (including the courts) don't want to hear all the evidence regarding fraud and treason.

This case is only about election laws not being followed.

Roberts ruled for PA to break it's own election laws before the election, and he did so with a smile on his face.

[9YearLurker]

Barnes is all too comfy and happy with the “Trump will come back and win in four years” scenario IMO.

[Rockingham]

In addition, the Supreme Court is more directly on the hook for its decision in this case of original jurisdiction because no lower courts or prior litigation choices can be dragged in to get blamed for an unpalatable outcome.

Moreover, if, as expected, the Left mounts an attack on the independence of the Court and the federal judiciary, a decision to do nothing in this election controversy will deflate conservative support for them. What good are the Supreme Court and other federal courts if they refuse to review and remedy a stolen Presidential election? If so, the best strategy for conservatives may be to let the Left burn the federal judiciary down but then aim for an opportunity to rebuild on our own terms.