It's obvious by now that no one (including the courts) don't want to hear all the evidence regarding fraud and treason.
This case is only about election laws not being followed.
Roberts ruled for PA to break it's own election laws before the election, and he did so with a smile on his face.
I was under the impression that the Kelley case in PA about allowing mail-in ballots contrary to the PA State Constitution VII sec 14 was also about election laws not being followed.
Since the election had not yet taken place, the justification for letting it go ahead was that no one had yet been "injured."
Of course, now that the election is over, all we're going to hear about is millions of Biden voters that will be disenfranchised if their mail-in ballots are thrown out(never mind that it's impossible to disenfranchise illegal voters -- in fact the only ones disenfranchised will be the legal voters if the fraud is allowed to stand).
Dread Justice Roberts is a slime ball. This is why Trump recently suggested for Roberts to stay in Malta and not come back.
Trump knows that Roberts was in on the steal. He should be dealt with accordingly. spit.
Yes.
In the same way that that case against Al Capone was only about tax evasion and the case against Alger Hiss was only about perjury.
The underlying issue dwarfs the formal charges, which are limited to what can be proved in court.