Everyday Example For Understanding The Texas Lawsuit ('Audacious' Vanity)

Freerepublic.com ^ | December 9, 2020 | Texas AG and Hostage

[Jane Long]

If you have a ping list, for your ‘Audacious Election Lawsuits Vanities’, please add me ;-)

And, thank you for posting these.

[Hostage]

My pleasure!

[Svartalfiar]

Thinking on this further, the President’s lawsuit to intervene (join) Texas, is critical as it goes to real injury and claims FRAUD.

Eh. Adding fraud arguments to this I think, takes away from the arguments as they're very subjective, and so far Trump's team has either forgotten to bring the evidence, or so incompetent they're unable to produce anything meaningful. Or the judges so far have just been that corrupt, but some of them have been Trump appointees, so I don't know how well that argument holds across the board. I think the case has a better overall chance of success by only working on the Constitutional issues, and letting the fraud go for a different court battle.

Trump intervening does help add the 'injury for standing', but I don't think that's really necessary.
Of course, injury should not be a requirement for standing in order to sue a gov't entity for a law or such that isn't legal; as a citizen to whom that law applies, you (should) automatically have standing.

[TianaHighrider]

Thank you for this.

[Hostage]

> “Trump’s team has either forgotten to bring the evidence, or so incompetent they’re unable to produce anything meaningful.”

Strong statement. Have ou read the President’s intervene complaint?