[greeneyes]

Otherwise, it's too easy for them to say..can't dis-enfranchise x amount of voters” etc.
*********************************************************************************
Anytime any one makes this statement, it should be asked since when do dead people, non-citizens (such as Russians, Chinese, Mexicans etc.), and fake ballots or algorithms are supposed to be equivalent to the votes of real citizens?

[stylin19a]

Anytime any one makes this statement, it should be asked since when do dead people, non-citizens (such as Russians, Chinese, Mexicans etc.), and fake ballots or algorithms are supposed to be equivalent to the votes of real citizens?

ThanQ.
doesn't matter...yet. fraud hasn't been deemed proven....yet.
Yet what matters, for now, on the board is 7+million more popular votes for Biden than Pres. Trump.
and what matters, for now, Electoral Votes show Biden 306-232.(I know...the count hasn't been done so it's still 0-0 - do I really have to cover all the bases ?) and so far, if it even got that far, judges have already been saying it in some form or another in their decline decisions...

recent example:

If granted, the relief would disenfranchise the votes of the more than 5.5 million Michigan citizens who, with dignity, hope, and a promise of a voice, participated in the 2020 General Election. The Court declines to grant Plaintiffs this relief.

LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: December 7, 2020

We need SCOTUS to hear this. And I'm guessing there is no next after this regardless of how they rule.