It says “injunctive relief” - that read to me meaning in entirety. As noted by others, this case is semi moot given the same issue is presented by Texas which has better + greater standing.
I think the SCOTUS taking the Texas case puts the 4 states in that action on the table as far as electoral college activity because I think a qualifier for accepting things + safe harbor etc. delineates that there cannot be legal actions pending before so doing (?)
Imma let this one play out but keeping my options open.
I know and can prove that absentee and mail-in ballots in Midland County were NOT improperly “backdated” by the USPS or election officials.
Nor were manufactured ballots run through our tabulators multiple times.
We did not use Dominion tabulators so any improper vote-switching algorithm was not made equally available to Midland county voters.
The courts, so far, have said that while plausible, this type of fraud does not alter the election.
I will file for injunctive relief as my 14th amendment rights to equal _application_ and protection was violated.
My county had no such fraud made available to it by local election officials like the Wayne county officials made available.
If Wayne county was allowed fraud, I want ballot fraud to be visited upon my county too in equal proportion and effort as found in Wayne county.
It’s only fair and equitable.
There is still plenty of time left.
(This just might become a letter to the editor...)