Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

“But if you test positive, SARS-CoV-2 is present in your body.”

False. The test picks up all kinds of other fragments. How was the system calibrated when, at the time the test was designed, there was not an isolated sample of covid19 available. Is there one now? Show us the proof.


36 posted on 12/07/2020 2:26:26 PM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: SecAmndmt

The genetic code for SARS-CoV-2 was released to the world on January 11th. https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/01/china-releases-genetic-data-new-coronavirus-now-deadly

Samples were isolated from the airway epithelial cells of infected patients in Wuhan China in December 2019 and the new pathogen was sequenced shortly thereafter. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7180649/

The NCBI genome ID is 86693: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=86693

How do you create a test that looks for specific genetic sequences when you don’t have a sample of the virus itself? Well, you look at the genetic sequences that distinguish the virus from all others and you design a test to look for them. It’s pretty straightforward.


39 posted on 12/07/2020 2:39:07 PM PST by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson