Posted on 12/06/2020 2:22:50 PM PST by Reverend Wright
Previous work on the subject has explored the applicability of ultraviolet, visible and infrared (IR) lasers under nanosecond pulses for toner removal. This article expands on this work by testing a wider range of ultrafast and long-pulsed lasers.
For election fraud, the significance of this comes from being combined with scanners that are also ballot marking devices. If those ballot markers contain a laser (ie laser printer) it needs to be verified that those lasers cannot be used for toner removal, to remove Trump votes and remark the paper ballot for Biden.
(Excerpt) Read more at royalsocietypublishing.org ...
https://www.salon.com/2019/03/28/new-hybrid-voting-system-can-change-paper-ballot-after-its-been-cast_partner/
Isn’t that similar to how tattoos are removed?
Wouldn’t it be easier to replace the entire ballot?
Way back in the 60s a high school friend of mine had built a 3 inch ruby rod laser housed in a lunchbox thermos and powered by an army 100 pound suitcase full of capacitors. He showed me how it could neatly remove one printed letter from a sheet of typing. He said those things would eventually disable ICBMs.
Yes I believe so. so it would work on other inks, not just toner inks.
“Wouldn’t it be easier to replace the entire ballot?”
Yes it would, but using the machine to change the ballot doesn’t require a person to do anything.
It would also be consistent with these claims that votes were electronically switched for Biden. But the hand count of paper ballots matched.
No offense, but I think that “ballot scanners with frickin’ vote erasing lasers on their heads” is going a bit too far into tinfoil hat land.
Not only would the scanners need ink erasing lasers installed, they would also need a means to print a new vote on the ballot, and do it in such a way that it matches the ink color and penmanship of every other mark on the ballot.
Oh, and both the erasing laser and the color print head has to be undetectable by maintenance personnel.
Dominion machines don't read red laser.
So, when they're copying spoiled ballots in red ink.....they don't count.
Much easier/cheaper/less detectable to do this in software; only allow the fraudulent code to work between two dates, say, 01-JAN-20 through 03-NOV-20. So, during testing after the fact, it will work fine 100%. The only way to really tell what’s going on is to disassemble the code in the machines, assuming that it ‘s the same code running now and/or it didn’t rewrite entirely normal code and then erase itself. I can think of a hundred different ways to do this sort of thing that would be VERY hard to find, even by experts. You would need a static image of what ran that night.
It doesn't need to be verified because this is the stupidest crap I've read on the internet all month.
Agreed. Also, I doubt that the erasing could leave no trace of the original vote and leave no evidence that the erasing had occurred.
This toner removal thing sounds like a stretch to me. I would rather stick with more simple explanations.
Why did one ballot counting place run out of ink?
What were they using ink for?
Computers need to be totally removed from the voting process.
“That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.” - Neil Armstrong
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.