To: All
1,619 posted on
12/08/2020 7:52:25 AM PST by
Squidpup
("Fight the Good Fight of Faith" )
To: Squidpup
So this would mean that the investigations that John Durham has been doing, will now be able to be prosecuted? Since the criminals Durham has been investigating (and of course I do not know the extent of them) at the very least committed crimes in numerous locations, does this mean that no matter where the crimes were committed, he can now roll ahead with prosectuions?
1,649 posted on
12/08/2020 8:26:39 AM PST by
little jeremiah
(Thirst for truth is the most valuable possession and no one can take it away from you.)
To: Squidpup
Well hello there, that was a boom. Missed it because it came out the day I went out of town. The article I read said it’s hard to fire a special prosecutor due to potential backlash. Boe Jivin says hold muh beer.
1,729 posted on
12/08/2020 10:32:11 AM PST by
ichabod1
(He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB)
1,877 posted on
12/08/2020 12:56:13 PM PST by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
To: Squidpup
I believe we are about to be introduced to Mr. John Durham.
1,897 posted on
12/08/2020 1:10:46 PM PST by
Cats Pajamas
(President Trump won so big he broke their algorithm!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
