Posted on 12/06/2020 8:49:17 AM PST by Phillyred
You are so FoS. How much do you want to bet I can find an interview with Gabriel Sterling on Newsmax where he used the analogy? If the analogy is from Gabriel then I saw it on Newsmx. Go search it out and I’ll be around for your apology. Pffft.
ping
What was the model’s error ? Was extra Biden vote numbers outside the error?
Too late to change your story now.
You said in Post #195 you quote "couldn't pick Gabriel Sterling out of a lineup of two" end quote, so it's FAR too late to now say you DID see his interview on TV.
In fact your story/alibi is obviously completely contradictory. In back to back posts.
You are caught, in a web of deceit, of your own making.
A few months ago there was something on the web (Facebook?) trying to get Washington Republicans out to vote. They said that in Washington State, something like 65% of registered Dems vote, while only 45% of Republicans vote. The thinking being that “Well, what’s the use, we can’t win anyway.”
Hearing about these machines, it wouldn’t surprise me if the actual vote isn’t more like 50/50, and the machines take care of that 20% difference.
You are the one busted trying to involve me as some devoted CNN watcher and troll. You are working against the truth and that never works out. Like I said though, I can't find you on my list of people who actually read and consider my posts, so carry on accusing people of ridiculous things and see how that works out for your credibility.
If the machines were set to fractionalize the votes for biden at say 110%,as long as Trump won by less then 10% it would show a biden win.Then the necessary number of additional ballots could be added to the stack in case of hand recounts.
The problem was ... Trump was winning by more then the pre-set fraction and the machines would say he won. Counting had to be stopped and the numbers changed before that happened.
A prepared number of extra ballots were standing by ready to go but because of the red wave it wasn’t going to be enough.
They were forced to use the extras to generate votes for the machines to count, then they had to find more to make the hand count stacks hit the numbers.
It all would have run hidden in the background if the numbers hadn’t been so one-sided.
There a bit more to it but this is the base of the fraud.
The question now is .... will truth prevail ?
It all would have run hidden in the background if the numbers hadn’t been so one-sided. There a bit more to it but this is the base of the fraud.
The question now is .... will truth prevail ?
If you could just add the ballots and get away with it, why would you need the machines involved at all? If there was fraud, it didn't involve the machines, at least as it pertains to Georgia and the Presidential race. That has been conclusively shown.
You’re simply not believable.
You come on here every day with an intense and specific devotion to defending the brand name Dominion Voting Systems.
Today you used the exact same obscure analogy to “Ocean’s 11” as another person well known for their devotion to Dominion - Gabriel Sterling - has been using.
When I pointed the oddness of that out, you tried to claim it was pure coincidence, and that you didn’t even know what Gabriel Sterling would look like on TV, even though he is very unique in his appearance.
When I pointed out the obviousness of that not possibly being coincidental, or true, you realized you were caught in an obvious lie, and in the very next post tried to change your story that you actually DID see Gabriel Sterling on TV, and that must be where your analogy came from.
Did you really think we would just forget you had just said that you didn’t even know what he looks like, even after you were obviously caught using his obscure analogy to defend Dominion?
LOL of course not. You’re just spinning like a top cause you don’t know what else to do LOL.
No apology yet? Oh yeah, you can’t be shown. Anything.
Exactly. State employees with years of experience have testified that tens of thousands of "test ballots" printed a few days before the election, were still in the warehouse when the election actually started.
One of them put a couple of these test ballots that should have been stale or invalidated by that time into the machine on election day, as a test, and *CHA-CHING* the Dominion machine counted it just like any other legal ballot. She said there were crates and crates of these "test ballots" still on site everywhere that day.
Until someone from Ware County confirms this, I doubt that it's true. However, that's not a good argument.
Your analogy is funny and spot on. You could add a hurricane of corruption thrashing the dock that they deny is there
You’re caught. You claimed you didn’t even know what Gabriel Sterling looked like, much less admit you used the same completely obscure analogy that he did in your defenses of Dominion, until I posted the transcript of it being on CNN.
Then WALA, you tried to change both your stories, finally admitting you DID know what he looks like, and admitting that your claim that it was a coincidence was pathetic, and you did get it from him, one way or another.
So now the question becomes, did you re-use Gabriel Sterling’s exact defense of Dominion because you saw it on TV (even though you originally denied that)?
Or did you get our defense of Dominion from Gabriel Sterling in some other manner?
Much obliged, friend. Downloaded and saved.
No apology? Should I go report the post where you suggested I was a CNN loyalist of some sort? That kind of brings to mind how it is that YOU knew it was a quote of Gabriel Sterling. I posted the link to the Newsmax interview he did. I don’t expect an apology from you though. You have completely adopted CNN’s tactics it seems and we have never seen CNN apologize.
Math isn't my strong suit but it looks like they're admitting an "error" that tracks in line with the purported weighting ratio of 1.25% for bitme and .75% for PDJT.
But didn’t the SOS tell the elections folks to not report the vote differences from election day and he only posted the original numbers? I know read something about that.
I have no idea.
The witness stated that the actual votes were above and below the model's predictions except in counties (NATIONWIDE) where Dominion systems were used. In these Biden got FIVE PERCENT above the model's predictions.
I don't know, but I do have Math degrees with a heavy emphasis on statistics. I assume that at least 100 counties are involved. If all the other counties are 50-50 (above-below) and the Dominion counties are say 98-2 (above-below) regardless of the percentage (and FIVE PERCENT seems high to me) that it is beyond a reasonable doubt (way beyond) that there was something wrong with the Dominion machines, just on the basis of simple binomial (coin-flip) distribution statistics. (I.e., if you flip a coin and 98 times out of 100 it comes up heads, it isn't an honest coin.)
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.