The folks in charge of deciphering man’s early languages, have been working out the bugs of the Pharoahic languages for how long, and just now came up with this?
I believe their time would be better spent on further translations of Nordic Runes, or the more sophisticated Ogham languages.
At least, the Runes and Ogham sticks are found across Europe, and even to Minnesota, whereas the Pharoahic language has only impacted the Nile valley culture.
Odd point of view, considering that Aramaic is under discussion, not Pharaonic Egyptian.