Posted on 11/28/2020 4:13:58 AM PST by MtnClimber
In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the Declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia’s name may not mean a lot to you, but it’s one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cybersecurity problems.
We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two-and-a-half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good:
SNIP
Professionally, Dr. Kershavarz-Nia has spent his career as a cybersecurity engineer. “My experience,” he attests,” spans 35 years performing technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern analysis, and security intelligence….” I will not belabor the point. Take it as given that Dr. Kershavarz-Nia may know more about cybersecurity than anyone else in America.
So, what does the brilliant Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have to say? This:
1. Hammer and Scorecard is real, not a hoax (as Democrats allege), and is used to manipulate election outcomes.
2. Dominion, ES&S, Scytl, and Smartmatic are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation – and the mainstream media reported on these vulnerabilities in the past.
3. Dominion has been used in other countries to “forge election results.”
4. Dominion’s corporate structure is deliberately confusing to hide relationships with Venezuela, China, and Cuba.
5. Dominion machines are easily hackable.
6. Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The Dominion key was stolen in 2019. Did they change it?
LET’S WIN BUMP
Here a link to Dominion’s Santa Clara contract....a clue as to how they operate:
https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov/Documents/CW2232168%%20%20%20Final.pdf
==================================
<><> Has anybody ever seen the original $100 million agreement Georgia made with Dominion for its voting services?
<><> Was Dominion's suspicious "late-date installation" outlined in Dominion’s $100 million contract with the State of Georgia?
<><> Did any Georgia official agree to Dominion’s suspicious late date installation before the election? If so, name them.
Bad Request - Invalid URL
HTTP Error 400. The request URL is invalid.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Wow - hadn't seen that. Maybe there is some factoid that renders it moot, but sure does sounds like this happened right about when the Dems would have been planning the meat of the steal.
The dems would have compartmentalized as much as possible each responsibility (and knowledge) in the steal for the greatest plausible deniability. This certainly sounds like one of the more important compartments/legos of their fetid little coup.
PING
bookmark
P4L
Okay, that works, thx!
Thank you for that link. Very interesting to read to get better idea of the component activities and capabilities of this system. Do you know whether that was a sole source negotiation, and if so, what the criterion/criteria were for making it such? If it was not, what other companies responded to the Request for Proposal? Do you know whether Dominion software was also their previous vendor? How many California counties use this vendor?
So easy to consume, even Democrats can understand...
Very interesting reading....
Here is the Declaration of Dr. Navid Keshavaz-Nia filed November 25, 2020
Exhibit Exhibit 109 — Document #1, Attachment #19
District Court, E.D. Michigan
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/1/19/king-v-whitmer/
Bkmk
Thx for posting it.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.