A sworn affidavit is the equivalent of sworn testimony.
Pay attention to the substance of the article and stop nitpicking with irrelevant arguments.
The election was fraudulent. And only a very few people are telling the truth about the fact. The fraud needs to be exposed.
The headline is so misleading that it paints a completely different picture from the truth. That’s not nitpicking.
They know that open court testimony is much more powerful than an affidavit. That’s why why they said it that way.
It’s trash tabloid journalism.