Interesting ... I wonder what the details will be? Will the Dems block it?
1 posted on
11/26/2020 9:33:03 AM PST by
RandFan
To: RandFan
Ain’t going anywhere in the house — kabuki theater is all this is.
To: RandFan
3 posted on
11/26/2020 9:36:11 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: RandFan
The Republic is under assault by a massive election fraud and Linda is arranging deck chairs on the Titanic
4 posted on
11/26/2020 9:38:13 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change.)
To: RandFan
Did Graham actually donate $500,000 to the Trump legal team or was it all talk?
To: RandFan
8 posted on
11/26/2020 9:42:08 AM PST by
hiho hiho
To: RandFan
adds a Good samaritan section to copy right laws.
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any decision or agreement made or action taken by a provider or user of an interactive computer service to restrict access to or availability of material provided by another information content provider.
12 posted on
11/26/2020 9:53:08 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: RandFan
We don’t understand how to name things. It should be called something libs could not argue against even though it has nothing to really do with its name. How about, “Internet Modernization to Protect Black Lives and a Right to an Abortion at Taxpayers Expense”. Why not? Black Lives Matter did it!
13 posted on
11/26/2020 10:06:50 AM PST by
TonyM
(Score Event)
To: RandFan
The proposed act should read “Online content compatible with the First Amendment Act”.
14 posted on
11/26/2020 10:08:23 AM PST by
vigilence
(Vigilence)
To: RandFan
We’ve outlawed birthright discrimination against people in retail establishments by declaring them public institutions. I support this. Any number of internet forums have risen to the popular class of pubIic institutions by advertising their tolerance for all political views. if we can protect people in public institutions by birthright then we can protect people in public institutions by 1st Amendment speech.
If owners of these venues don’t like it then they can get out of the business. Simple.
18 posted on
11/26/2020 10:37:49 AM PST by
nagant
To: RandFan
Since Graham has already won his reelection and won’t face voters for 6 years, I doubt if anything he sponsors is either 1) useful or 2) conservative
20 posted on
11/26/2020 12:48:53 PM PST by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: RandFan; alarm rider; Alex1977; at bay; Babsig; BILL_C; bnelson44; Califreak; ColdOne; DesScorp; ...
Another useless gesture by linda.
linda
Graham
ping!
Want on or off linda's fav ping list? Just FReepmail me.
21 posted on
11/26/2020 7:10:16 PM PST by
upchuck
(When Democrats cheat in front of the whole world, what do you think they will do behind your back?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson