[Steve Van Doorn]

I've not read it yet
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/4632

[RandFan]

Bookmark

thanks

[semimojo]

I've not read it yet...

The net is you can't prevent someone from posting content from another "information content provider" and if someone "editorializes or affirmatively and substantively modifies the content of another person or entity" they lose the liability protections.

In other words, Jim can't ban Infowars material nor delete posts unless they are “promoting self-harm, promoting terrorism, or unlawful” - the previous standard was "otherwise objectionable".