Skip to comments.
DannyTN's summary of Sidney Powell's GA filing
Self ^
 | 11/26/2020
 | DannyTN
Posted on 11/26/2020 9:31:15 AM PST by DannyTN
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next  last
To: DannyTN
21
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:48:00 AM PST
by 
rxtn41
 
To: DannyTN
    Great review. Will bookmark. Msm kinda quiet...trying to play it down. I suppose similar filings for pa...mi...ariz...wisconsin. Jail time or severe sanctions per trump executive order 9/13/2018?
 
22
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:48:16 AM PST
by 
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
 
To: Jim Noble
    The Political Question Doctrine seems to fit this particular round.
 
23
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:49:55 AM PST
by 
RummyChick
(I blame Kushner.)
 
To: ProtectOurFreedom
    May have tracked in real time before being wiped out. May be able to have tracked erasure procedures.
 
24
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:51:20 AM PST
by 
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
 
To: CivilWarBrewing
    It would seem they blocked observers so that no one could testify “I witnessed voter fraud/ impropriety,” in court. They’d take the slap in the wrist for limiting access for plausible deniability and lack of eye witnesses. Good thing it was still witnessed by astute observers.
 
25
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:52:16 AM PST
by 
Nathan _in_Arkansas
(Shut the deuce up!!!  I'll do the fighting!!!)
 
To: DannyTN
    Thank you for posting and doing this work!!
 
26
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:54:34 AM PST
by 
datura
(If you have to cheat, you didn't’ win.)
 
To: CivilWarBrewing
    They also need to audit the bar codes against the printed text of the votes on the ballot.
 
27
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:55:14 AM PST
by 
Beach333
( )
 
To: rxtn41
    Thank you Danny I’m impressed.
 
28
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:56:18 AM PST
by 
magua
(It's not racism, it's just that thisBecause it’s being reported that a lot of this started in 2015. )
 
To: RummyChick
    The issue of Standing is always critical in these types of cases. I understand the plaintiffs are the R delegate slate.
Let’s get everyone’s input on Standing.
 
29
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:56:57 AM PST
by 
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
 
To: DannyTN
    Yes, excellent work, thank you. 
Happy Thanksgiving too.
30
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:57:01 AM PST
by 
OKSooner
(BLOAT)
 
To: datura
    Big Trump supporter but this is going nowhere
 
To: DannyTN
    Great summary - thanks.
I think Powell presents a pretty strong case. It’ll be interesting to see how it does under cross examination.
There seems to be no question that the states own election rules (laws) were violated in a substantial way to cast doubt on the results and thus, at a minimum, the election should not be certified.
What a mess!
 
32
posted on 
11/26/2020 9:57:31 AM PST
by 
aquila48
(Do not let them make you care!  Guilting you is how they control you. )
 
To: Jane Long; DannyTN
33
posted on 
11/26/2020 10:02:32 AM PST
by 
4Liberty
(How does a kids car-donation nonprofit pay for so MANY radio ads if it's a charity?)
 
To: DannyTN
    Here's the reality: judges have good reason to fear that a ruling in favor of Trump will result in cities burning. On the other hand they don't fear our side at all. So far we've sat back collectively as this played out and nobody was shot, nothing was burned, no roads were blocked, nothing really. So given that they will take the path of least resistance and rule for Biden because they're scared cucks and they don't want it on their consciences. 
 There's a reason Hitler had his brownshirts and there's a reason the demos have their modern equivalents ANTIFA and BLM. They can get what they want using threats and intimidation while maintaining a certain appearance of distance from that.
34
posted on 
11/26/2020 10:04:05 AM PST
by 
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
 
To: DannyTN
    Thank you for your work on this.
 
35
posted on 
11/26/2020 10:06:32 AM PST
by 
ColoCdn
(Nihil, sine deo)
 
To: DannyTN
36
posted on 
11/26/2020 10:07:15 AM PST
by 
Mad Dawg
(Sta, si cum canibus magnis currere non potes, in portico. )
 
To: KC Burke
    If the court tosses the case out because “x does not have standing”, then the case just needs to be refiled with someone who does have standing.
That probably varies by state.
 
37
posted on 
11/26/2020 10:12:35 AM PST
by 
cgbg
( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
 
To: DannyTN
    Thanks, DannyTN!
What happens with that filing? Does a judge go through each count and accept or reject it, and give reasons for the acceptance or rejection?
 
To: cgbg
    The clock runs out on Safe Harbor date or on EC vote.
 
39
posted on 
11/26/2020 10:21:41 AM PST
by 
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
 
To: DannyTN
40
posted on 
11/26/2020 10:23:05 AM PST
by 
M Kehoe
(DRAIN THE SWAMP!  Finish THE WALL!)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson