I said post your numbers. Are you going to post any actual evidence that I'm wrong or just disparage the source?
I'm going to repeat what I said -- I consider Rasmussen more of credible and unbiased source than National Review.
You, obviously, are siding with National Review, which has been vehemently anti-Trump from the time he first started running.
But, the primary point here, one you haven't addressed, is that the mail-in ballots in Georgia did not undergo the same signature verification that the ballots cast at the polling did -- that is signatures being crossed checked by signatures at the DMV or through other public records.
The rejection rate of mail-ins in Georgia, thus, only were rejected at a pathetically low 0.3% rate compared to the three percent rate in normal elections. That opened the door for rampant voter fraud.
And, yes, the lack of a signature verification will likely lead to frauf and cost Republicans both Senate seats.
Would you like to address that point?