I'm going to repeat what I said -- I consider Rasmussen more of credible and unbiased source than National Review.
You, obviously, are siding with National Review, which has been vehemently anti-Trump from the time he first started running.
But, the primary point here, one you haven't addressed, is that the mail-in ballots in Georgia did not undergo the same signature verification that the ballots cast at the polling did -- that is signatures being crossed checked by signatures at the DMV or through other public records.
The rejection rate of mail-ins in Georgia, thus, only were rejected at a pathetically low 0.3% rate compared to the three percent rate in normal elections. That opened the door for rampant voter fraud.
And, yes, the lack of a signature verification will likely lead to frauf and cost Republicans both Senate seats.
Would you like to address that point?
Will you quit. I’m about sick of the purity test b.s. some of y’all are throwing around on here. If someone dares challenge the tiniest thing, yall subject them to a tongue lashing, call them a sellout, a cuck or a Never Trump sympathizer. Strangely enough, you aren’t behaving much differently from Never Trumpers- you’re ripping down you’re own side! 🙄