She’s not going to win this on affidavits and statistical anomalies alone...
She better have four aces up her sleeve and is just real good at misdirection.
I’m listening to her very carefully and she does not say she has direct evidence they committed this computer fraud in THIS election.
She’s referring to statistical analysis and why the system was created.
She’s also conflating that with a lot of the on site election reports.
I know how lawyers talk when they believe in their case, or want to believe in their case and that’s what I hear.
She’s also talking about legal process without acknowledging the unique situation here. She just said if she filed a month from now the states would all have to undo their certifications. Huh?
She keeps talking about what Hugo Chavez did, that does NOT prove it was done here in 2020.
She just said “are we to think it wasn’t done this time?” Well Sidney, you have to PROVE that.
She also said she only needs preponderance of the evidence in a civil case. This is NOT an ordinary civil case.
Sorry to say, but without more this isn’t working.
the dominion manual and the guy in venezuela are what sidney keeps pointing to as some smoking gun. oh, and Carol Malone’s letter in 2003 🙄