Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick
There is a legitimate Con Law issue in PA.

The issue is a flagarant violation of the equal protection clause, and more importantly, the remedy to the problem which is drastic. Remember in 2000 SCOTUS voted 7-2 that the equal protection clause was violated, but it was the remedy of shutting down the recount that was decided sharply 5-4.

The Judge in GA wondered why Trump was not involved in the suit L Lin Wood filed because Trump may have had standing

My explanation for that is that so far, they are selectively forum shopping for the right judge to hear the case. There are also abstention issues raised as well, that these cases should be heard in state court first. Judges are always looking for creative ways to clear their dockets and get it off their desks, especially with civil rights cases. In GA, they may prefer to litigate in state court, especially if they can't guarantee themselves a receptive federal judge. A hostile judge could just refuse to believe the affidavits and wreck their case. That is to be avoided at all costs.
60 posted on 11/21/2020 12:44:55 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Franklin

Reasonable explanation.


63 posted on 11/21/2020 2:22:33 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson