Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judge-rejects-plea-to-sanction-kirkland-for-associates-voicemail-to-lawyer-for-trump-campaign

“Brann didn’t explain the reason for denying sanctions, but he indicated in arguments on Tuesday that the voicemail wasn’t sanctionable, despite being “really bad form,” report Reuters Legal and Pennlive.com.

Brann indicated the issue wasn’t worth his time, according to Reuters Legal. “I’m just so busy and I have to deal with the main event,” he said.

The contents of the voicemail have not been made public....”


21 posted on 11/20/2020 4:00:46 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

“That associate was acting unilaterally, in his personal capacity, without the knowledge or authorization of undersigned counsel or the firm,”

https://www.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/2020/11/16/saying-shes-receiving-continuous-harassment-trump-lawyer-calls-for-sanctions-over-phone-call-from-kirkland-associate/

(in other words, please don’t sue us or fine us or sanction us..rogue lawyer)


23 posted on 11/20/2020 4:03:10 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
The contents of the voicemail have not been made public....”

I'm pretty sure I read, buried in some pleading, that physical violence was threatened.

65 posted on 11/21/2020 2:27:45 PM PST by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson