Didn’t she also say she doesn’t know if the good guys or bad guys have the servers? Kind of a weird statement IMO
Not really.
Not really. They were CIA servers, so go the rumors. If Brennan’s people have them, some would say they are in the hands of the bad people. Probably being “wiped with a cloth”.
That’s what I was thinking. Woods said this last week. They know they were gotten. But don’t know which side has them. Well, they are the good guys sooo if they don’t have them. Then that leaves one side. Unless Barr has them, he changed the rules so DOJ could investigate corruption before the election is called.
Didn’t she also say she doesn’t know if the good guys or bad guys have the servers? Kind of a weird statement IMO
+++++
For me it was just a huge disappointment. At this point I have very little faith that anything positive will come out of the supposed (but possibly real) computer seizure.
And I’m not a Debbie Downer. I listen to Bannon every day and he makes a lot of sense.
We have to remember, it was a press conference...she was talking to the enemy as well as talking to us.
They don’t want to give away what they have. They were setting traps today as well as highlighting the issues that the justices will be hearing.
Possibly not as weird as it may seem when you consider from the prospective of a election or campaign worker who may have to give testimony. Whether to cooperate and make a deal or hold out and face a felony sedition charge. Which way do you go when you don't know.
She means we don’t know if the servers were turned over to - Barr or military intelligence (good guy); or turned over to Wray or the CIA (bad guys), for example.
It’s not a weird statement.
It’s not like Deep State tattoos its minions.