Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The Pack Knight

I see your point, though. They shouldn’t have allowed fear to influence them. But in my youth, I lived in that kind of neighborhood to be closer to work. Most people who write comments here would have done what Palmer and Hartmann did in that situation.

Canvassers in those neighborhoods need to be young, in very good physical condition, very well trained in self-defense and have a large contingent of tough security guards with them (trained fighters with cameras connected to the Net, remote security watching over them, etc.). They really need a small army with them. They’d be surrounded by a foreign nation resembling Winnie Mandela’s mob.


62 posted on 11/19/2020 8:55:55 AM PST by familyop (Educate your neighbors every year, not only during election years. Fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: familyop
I'm certainly not unsympathetic. I can't imagine what it was like for them. I just don't think it's a strong argument for a government official to change his or her vote after the fact. On a related note, I AM unsympathetic to Ronald Hicks and Porter Wright, the Trump campaign's lawyers who bailed on him in the Pennsylvania litigation. It sucks that they were harassed, but Hicks is an election lawyer and had to know going in what might happen if he represented Donald Trump in post-election litigation in a battleground state. The Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct enumerate the reasons a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client, and exposure to public harassment and ridicule is not one of them.

Unless there's some other reason for the withdrawal that we don't know about, those lawyers violated their professional obligations. Sometimes the client wants to do something that the lawyer doesn't think he can do, but that's clearly not what happened here: The campaign actually dropped their more controversial claims after Porter Wright withdrew. The only innocent explanation I can think of is that the campaign no longer wanted to pay Porter Wright's fees--they have certainly gone with what appear to be less expensive lawyers since then.

I know this is not specifically what we were talking about, but as a lawyer I feel the need to rant about it.

64 posted on 11/19/2020 9:11:49 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson