Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

What do you think a full Audit of Wayne County/Detroit etc would show?

I seem to recall a full recount at the request of the Green Party in 2016. It immediately found all sorts of issues and got shut down fast.

This might be a particularly good trap set by the GOP. If the GOP wants to continue seeing Detroit cheatery then fine, but if not, get that city under a full audit.

I’m assuming you can’t just let the partisans do the auditing, and might bring in some more serious officials as part of the process and see far less bullying? Also, how about the DOJ show up and “help out”?


714 posted on 11/17/2020 7:10:39 PM PST by Professional ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies ]


To: Professional; little jeremiah; grey_whiskers; bitt

Lou Dobbs interview with Russ Ramsland, regarding voting machines & Michigan:

https://youtu.be/LPdD8Cd5PGI


723 posted on 11/17/2020 7:18:00 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 714 | View Replies ]

To: Professional

This may go right to the heart of the Biden-Third Party Vote switch operation.


736 posted on 11/17/2020 7:33:50 PM PST by DrDude (PAIN! Pain! Pain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 714 | View Replies ]

To: Professional; numberonepal

The results of a selective audit, either random or directed, should show several areas of concern.
If each selected area indicates a concern, than a wide-ranging (full universe) audit shall be done.
If the wide-ranging audit returns several duplicate concerns across the range, then a file-by-file canvass must be done.

These are the steps of an audit scheme, inherent in business.
They are standards followed by accountants, compliance officers and consultants throughout the USA.

What that means for the elections is that the 3rd-party auditing board and the client/certifier (election officials) arrive at an agreed selection of precincts to audit.
Those performing the audit must be a third party with credentials of integrity.
Those that show possible fraud may or may not indicate a look at all the precincts (”recanvas”) for similar fraud indicators.
If there are similar fraud indicators in a majority of precincts then a file-by-file (recount) is needed.

Notes: 1) Each step must be agreed to by both political parties. There is no effort to determine party benefit in the audits, simply the existence of any fraud.
2) It is recommended in contentious situations that a new group of auditors be utilized for each successive step.
3) Each step must reveal a need for the next step. At any point the client declines to follow through with a proper audit step, the audit cannot be certified by the auditing group.

There is also an unfortunate side of this. At present, the only “officially certified” auditors I can find through open-source research are trained/certified by CISA.
Recent events have thrown a partisan shade on the CISA and accordingly, would seem to disallow these auditors from consideration.
I cannot find any individual state certified auditing group.
States may need to default to accountants or other auditing contractors who may have non-partisan bona fides.
YMMV


896 posted on 11/18/2020 4:06:35 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (If there be WAR in the offing, let it begin HERE. With ME.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 714 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson