2,600 ballots found in Georgia which were uncounted. 2/3 were Trump votes. Again and again- why are the mistakes always *coincidentally* at the cost of Republicans and never the other way around?
grey_whiskers wrote:
“2,600 ballots found in Georgia which were uncounted. 2/3 were Trump votes. Again and again- why are the mistakes always *coincidentally* at the cost of Republicans and never the other way around?”
Because fraud; see transcript of Sidney’s interview with Lou Dobbs:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3906765/posts?page=1#1
Transcript:
POWELL: Iâve just got some stunning evidence from a witness, a high-ranking military officer who was present when Smart-Matic was designed. And Iâm gonna just read you some of these statements, if you donât mind, so I get them exactly right:
From the Affidavit: Designed in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumbprint or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voterâs name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote.
He made it clear that the system would have to be set up but not leave any evidence of the changed vote for the specific voter, and that there would be no evidence to show, and nothing to contradict that the name and the fingerprint or thumbprint was going with a changed vote. SmartMatic agreed to create such a system and produced the software and the hardware that accomplished the result for President [Hugo] Chavez.
After the SmartMatic electoral system was put into place, he closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using the SmartMatic software. Once such election was in 2006, when Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over Rosales, a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez, vs. 3.7 million for Rosales.
In 2013, he witnessed another Venezuelan national election where the SmartMatic system was used to manipulate and change the results. In a control room where multiple digital display screens were shown for results and voting, the actual voting results were fed into that room and onto the displays over an Internet feed, which was connected to a sophisticated computer system created by SmartMatic.
People in that room were able to see in real time whether the votes that came through the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from any specific area or as a national total was going to be against either candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulating computer had the ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one candidate to another by using the SmartMatic software.
[End]