There are NO signature of dead people. The number of signatures In The voter roll books will not match the number of votes counted. SCOTUS established in Gore vs BU-SH one person one votes rule. It will be important in this case. Cannot have 110+% of people in precinct voting. They have over reached. They will argue since they cannot determine (but here’s where corn ink comes to play) which are real and which are fake they will argue that to throw all out will disenfranchise voters. To count all will do same. Not time to revote. So ... this is where the watermark ballots come to play. We WIN Win Win.
I understand that. I was just trying to decipher what was being said.
“They will argue since they cannot determine (but here’s where corn ink comes to play) which are real and which are fake they will argue that to throw all out will disenfranchise voters. To count all will do same.”
I’ve been wondering which way a court would go. IMO keeping in fake votes allows corruption to stand, and so disenfranchises real voters. Alito told PA to separate
based on arrival date, and since they didn’t do that until he told them a second time, that whole batch of balance needs to be thrown out. Otherwise corruption is rewarded