Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Wouldn’t you have to use decimals if you were going to be shifting a finite number of votes and don’t want a rounding error?
**********************************************************************************************
I am not techno smart. However, in the black box voting case, that I read about, what was found was that the program was set to simply show the whole numbers, so no one would know that there were decimals.

The program was preprogrammed to give a predetermined amount such as 51% to the preferred candidate. The man who discovered this, did not believe that it was possible to do it, but was asked to study the system and figure out how it was done or prove it wasn’t kinda thing.

I read about this in 2015, so my recollection is a bit vague.


1,692 posted on 11/13/2020 4:33:51 PM PST by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1304 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes

All the President needs to do at this point is to show foreign interference in the elections.

At that point most state legislatures will consent to vote their own slate of electors.

He doesn’t even have to prove WHO. There are plenty of statistical anomalies. If they can be proven to have originated offshore-BINGO -the state legislature will NOT certify the vote


1,695 posted on 11/13/2020 4:34:59 PM PST by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1692 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson