Posted on 11/11/2020 5:23:05 AM PST by Taffylucy
No but 4 Docotrates Ayyudari is. What he presents is not new or original. More to the point he could have presented it in 5 minutes or less. Just show the plot, state what you have pltoted, make the statement that it shows that votes were stolen from Trump in increasing numbers as as the Republican percentage increases in precincts [why do you rob banks - because that is where the money is], and then maybe explain in some more detail. The whole thing could be summarized in one minute and explained in some depth in 5 minutes for those who want to hear more than the one minute. A lot more people would watch it. And once you know what the axes are, and see the data points the conclusion is clear to any observer who is not authorized by CNN to look at it.
Instead 4-doctors Ayyudari goes on for over an hour.
“So far all I see is anecdotes and affidavits and Gateway Pundit. Is there anything tangible?”
~~~~~~
If you’re waiting for confirmation from the NYT and AP, you’ll grow old and die.
LOLOL!! ^5
Let it go, bud.
Why not wait to see how it all plays out, then come back and either boast about your forwarning, or offer an apology.
In the meantime....we’re ALL on the same side, here. Don’t attack the messenger/s.
She posted a (GP) link that had different sources.
This isn’t the only source, others are running the same analysis.
GP would be so much more effective if they would edit for clarity, simplify the format and get rid of the clutter of advertising.
That's my whole point. A lot of people who are a lot more credible and who can just get down to business and cut out the theater are doing this a whole lot better than Mr. 4-doctoers here. Sorry, but I know the guy well because he inevitably shows up on all sorts of issues, is wrong on many and causes confusion.
You would never use the guy as an expert witness because the other side would delve into his known past and make mincemeat of him.
Well, bash GP all you want.
He’s one of the very FEW, in the media, even reporting on any of this national election fraud.
Bannon actually lauded Hoft, yesterday, on his Warroom program, for the great work he/his team is doing.
I don’t think he has an elaborate set up/staff, so, I’ll give him a bit of a pass, on the editing side.
Again....we’re all on the same side, here....or, at least I thought we are.
I mention my PhD here in this context only because my special expertise is digging out technical flakes and frauds because a lot of money is at stake. Otherwise I weigh the value of what people say by what they say - and whether they can get to a solid relevant point quickly backed up by evidence - with little weight given to their degree or degree of degree unless they start to make a point of these, then it suggests that they are drawing attention away from what they are saying and standing on their authority to say it.
I get that. But I am trying to get conservatives to pay enough attention for format and presentation and editorial control that none of that detracts from the message. GP would be a lot more effective with a bit of attention paid to those things.
A good scientist doesn’t need to be in a business suit. He can wear jeans and a t-shirt. But it helps if he ties his shoes and matches his socks.
The house is burning down and people here are complaining about the color of the fire truck, lol
Alright already. Why are you burning so many cycles on this?
We are all seeking the agnostic truth to what appears to be a hydra-headed abomination of dark intentions, wherever it leads.
Only, you are the one being a distraction.....from what we SHOULD be focusing on, FRiend.
I’m done with going back and forth with you, on this.
Let’s not not miss the forest (of news/evidence) for the trees (editing/presentation, etc.) There can always be a morsel, or a mountain, of evidence in the forest.
You take care....I’m keeping my eyes on the final prize.....a WIN, for Trump, and proof of STEALING, by the Dems/globalists.
Those damned yellow fire trucks, what’s with that?
Because we can do it so much better if we avoid the odd rather prominent flake or drama queen.
Exactly. Unreal.
I think people might wish to consider a very likely alternative. She was there (McConnell’s office) at the behest of the president who wished to send a message to Schumer. All of the discussions about Haskell being on the chopping block are invented out of whole cloth, weaving wild circumstantial evidence to come up with the claim. Trump has never that nor has he had a very public falling out with her like he did with Esper (or Wray).
She might be doing good work here for Trump, and delivering a message for him. We just don’t know and her world is a murky one to begin with. Perhaps she has information about foreign influences (China), or perhaps she signal intelligence regarding money being moved in foreign accounts. All kinds of possibilities, and we just don’t know. Because we can’t know.
We should wait and see which players are wearing which uniforms before making judgments that we just can’t make now.
Federal RICO time.
NO early time off for Federal felony convictions.
At this point, it appears the lowest ones on the totem pole are coming forward & give sworn affidavits.
The Dems cannot shut them all up.
Also-—OUR side has over 9 trillion bullets. That is another ‘game changer’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.