Posted on 11/10/2020 12:27:10 PM PST by PK1991
Can you provide recommendations for the best organization to give a donation that will help the Trump stop the steal effort. And why that is a good one. I don't want to give to something that will be squandered on typical uni-party nonsense.
Your church or synagogue...............
www.donaldjtrump.com and click on the bar at the top. Most organizations are just making noise.
Mark Steyn has been saying that the lawyers Trump hired for this fight have been leaking stuff to the NY Times, so maybe they can’t be trusted. If we send money in response to the emails, are we just enriching these traitors? I don’t know.
Gun Owners of America sent out a plea for money to help the Republicans in Georgia. That is an important fight.
I gave here at the official Trump legal defense site:
stay away from stop the steal... i donated $1000 to them and they sent me a biden tshirt.
sheesh...
just kidding
The first 2 especially PV is doing Herculean work. PV is gathering hard evidence.
www.stopthesteal.us
Only a Republican Senate can block abolition of the Electoral College, citizenship for 15 million illegal aliens, statehood for D.C. and Puerto Rico (giving an unbeatable Dem majority to the Senate), nullifying the 2nd Amendment and other liberty-ending ideas the Dems are planning. I just donated as much as I can afford to the effort. Soros, Silicon Valley tech giants, Hollywood and Wall Street liberals will be heavily funding the Dems. Do what you can now!
https://secure.winred.com/georgians-for-kelly/perdue-for-senate-defend-the-majority
Heritage Foundation. They have a group that can and will provide man power at audits and recounts. The official Trump defense fund listed below.
“the lawyers Trump hired for this fight have been leaking stuff to the NY Times”
My God, the deep-staters are everywhere.
First, we have to know the ways.
‘STOP THE STEAL””
The system of voting for the President of the United States has been under assault for years, and now this subversion appears to be close to paying off.
There is and always has been incentive for a less popular and even malevolent agenda in political movements to overcome their deficiency in appeal with various schemes to nullify or even reverse the will of the people. The franchise to vote is one of the major means by which, from time to time, that the will of the people is expressed. The sanctity of that franchise is preserved in numerous judicial decisions that support “one person, one vote”, a doctrine that accords each individual eligible voter the assurance his or her vote will not be diluted by false or fraudulent votes being included in the final count.
But yet, the growth in these schemes has been encouraged in recent years, to the degree that the fraudulent and bogus votes can and have overwhelmed the honest and true opinions of the informed voters who go to the polls. The first line of defense, that the individual holder of the franchise of the right to vote, be fully informed, has been thwarted by the sometimes massive suppression of real information delivered to the public at large. There is a right, inscribed in the First Amendment, that Congress shall make no law “abridging the freedom of speech, or the press” as part of the very important rights not directly addressed in the words of the body of the Constitution itself.
There is a concerted effort, not on the part of the government, but on the part of those expressing THEIR right of freedom of speech, or of the press, to proactively and aggressively suppress the free speech rights of others with whom they disagree. Whatever happened to the meaning of the assertion attributed to Evelyn Beatrice Hall, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” A great deal of obfuscation and distortion has been thrown out there in recent years, and efforts to counter these statements of misinformation and disinformation are fiercely and sometimes successfully suppressed by a storm of vitriol and unjust criticism from the supposedly “free” press, and by persons who do NOT represent the majority opinion prevailing, up to and including the threat of political assassination. The politics of personal destruction include attacks not on the principles expressed, but direct and scurrilous assaults on an ad hominem basis.
Over the years, the systems for preserving the sanctity of the vote itself have also come under attack, first by denying that the right to vote should be limited to the part of the population that has proven their citizenship, and their fitness to exercise that franchise. Then, the further demand that the eligible voter must prove to the authorities that the person voting is in fact the person who claims to be the person, by presentation of a valid proof of personal identity. Most recently, this has come to be some form of photo-based officially issued identity card, coupled with some form of signature. This person, having been identified, then is authorized to vote once and once only, in any sanctioned election at whatever level of government venue that may apply. Fair, equitable, and available to all eligible voters without prejudice.
Only, not so. Any number of “exceptions” are applied by the authorities that maintain the voting rolls, in that actual proof of identity of self is not necessary, and the word of the person is sufficient to vote, in most places by “provisionary” means, which means though a ballot may be filled out and submitted, it cannot be counted in the final tally until the provisions have been satisfied. Only, this ballot gets commingled with the real and valid ballots, by a little sly legerdemain, a term that means “dexterous, skillful at fooling others through sleights of hand”. This is done in back rooms, by dishonest clerks, out of sight of any party interested in the fairness of the count.
But even more than the provisional votes, are those who are filled out in the name of persons who may be on the voting rolls, but have not exercised their franchise to vote, sometimes for years. These people may have died, or moved away without notifying the persons who maintain the voting rolls, but their name is there nevertheless. GOLDEN opportunity, to simply manufacture a valid-looking vote for whomever the person controlling the lists, or has access to those lists, to slip in yet another false ballot, and thus further skew the vote totals. From time to time, the authorities who maintain these voter rolls are called upon to purge the lists of those who may not have voted in several successive elections, but this action is most ferociously resisted by those who have an interest in using the inactive voter names in padding out the vote. Thus you get peculiar outcomes like some voters that have been voting “continuously” for maybe 75 to 100 years, and more “eligible” voters than the entire population of a given district, including men, women, children, dogs, cats, and goldfish. Some 200% of the vote in some districts may mysteriously be ALL for one designated candidate or slate of candidates. Now, THAT is not suspicious at all.
And the biggest fraud of all, most recently introduced, of simply scattergunning out ballots to every voter on the sometimes hopelessly outdated voter rolls, in the hopes that many of these votes would get back to the ballot clerks. And many of them do, but then, the voter also comes in and votes besides, thus a double vote, illegal in any election. Or a third party votes in the name of the person for whom the mail-in ballot was addressed.
Now, the postmark on the ballot envelope is supposed to be before the close of the polls on Election day, a date certain on the calendar, and this information is available to all, But now, these mail-in ballots are being accepted, some with no postmark, others with late postmarks, well after the date of election, and incredibly, shuffled in with the valid ballots. Not a chance of fraud THERE, for sure.
And the count goes on and on, with sometimes little or no effort being exerted to assure the dictum “one person, one vote” is being pursued in the letter and in the spirit of the law.
“Vox populi vox Dei” - the voice of the people (is) the voice of God. But for the voice of the people to be the voice of God, there is also an abiding demand that it also be the TRUE voice.
We have not heard the true voice of America.
From the fine print on the “legal defense site”:
“Trump Make America Great Again Committee (“TMAGAC”) is a joint fundraising committee composed of participating committees Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (“DJTP”), Save America, and the Republican National Committee (“RNC”).”
Everything I’m getting spammed with has the same combination of groups; I don’t want to give to the RNC I just want to give to the legal fund. Have to read the fine print.
“Project Veritas, Judicial Watch, Donald Trump Defense”
Agree totally. I’ve been giving serious $ to JW.
ditto
I get 20 solicitations a day from the Trump organization asking for money for the recount. Are used to be able to give directly to donaldtrump.com but now it gives 60% to Donald Trump and 40% to the RNC which I hate. But I decided to give anyway. Every time I am going to push the submit button it shows that I will be giving the same amount every week. I do not want to give the same amount every week I want to give one time. So I back off and don’t give. I need to find another way also.
I gave 40 bucks to Trump this morning. Hoping the bucks help to fight the fraud.
That one gives 40% to the RNC - which gives 0% support to the President!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.