Scytl is a company in Barcelona Spain, and their servers are in Germany. But do the servers contain the data in its original form and all subsequent updates made, or only the latest data upload with no history of changes. Sounded to me as if it is the latter that is likely the case.
Check the very bottom of the GA SOS page, copyright SCTYL 2020
https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/GA/105369/web.264614/
Any connections you find, please post on Laz’s mega research thread. All sorts of evidence being put together there to submit to Trump’s team, lawyers, etc:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3903425/posts
It would have to be the other way around. You’d need a central system somewhere keeping track of the changes that were implemented... or the cheat might not work and could be more easily exposed. That the local systems had repeated local database resets means you couldn’t track the changes on the local machines if they’d wiped the log files... or were set to not record them. But, the external central computation server couldn’t drop log files without risking losing track of the count entirely.
They’re not done “counting” yet... so... they can’t drop the data without risking losing the election ? Oh, the tangled web...