Replies

Michigan again:

Today, the Antrim County report on flagrant fraud in Dominion voting machines continued to gather momentum.

However, the report points out that the Michigan Secretary of State violated Michigan law in requiring data recording the “adjudication” of votes be preserved... She had the data wiped to hide the evidence of fraud. Too bad for her that doing that won’t work.

The Constitution and the law do provide the means for contesting fraudulent elections. A key element in that is presenting competing slates of electors while challenging the legitimacy of those fraudulently elected.

Which provides proper context for considering the action of the Governor of Michigan, today, in deliberately obstructing the rightful actions of the State Legislature, obstructing their legal process of contesting the legitimacy of wrongly chosen electors... by engaging the State Police to deny access to the Capitol to the alternative slate of electors.

The action apparently was paired with threats of arrest being made... directly violating Michigan law, which makes it a felony to wrongly use government power to threaten public officials engaged in rightful conduct of their duty under the law.

Michigan’s Governor now joins the Secretary of State in having crossed that line...

Governor Just SHUT DOWN Vote In Michigan
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3915393/posts

Worth noting there... is that the law defining the date for the electors to conduct their vote... does not trump the Constitution, nor does it have any obvious effect when the failure to meet a deadline in conducting the vote is the direct result of felonies committed by the Governor in attempting to prevent the vote. They tried, today, and failed due to the interference... which doesn’t prevent them succeeding at a later date and sending their electors along to the President of the Senate for consideration... now with the additional issue of the felonies committed in the attempt to prevent them submitting the competing slate of electors, as is their right under the law...

Should get interesting when Pence considers which electors to admit, in light of 3USC6: ...and if there shall have been any final determination in a State in the manner provided for by law of a controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, it shall be the duty of the executive of such State, as soon as practicable after such determination, to communicate under the seal of the State to the Archivist of the United States a certificate of such determination in form and manner as the same shall have been made...

In Michigan... the controversy was “resolved” by the Governor committing a felony to prevent the controversy being heard.

That probably won’t go over well...