Posted on 12/14/2020 2:58:48 PM PST by Enlightened1
HISTORIC AND UNPARALLELED - PA, GA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, and NM all had GOP electors cast votes for @realDonaldTrump .
That preserves @POTUS right to remedy fraud with his own electors.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Anyone Freeper wondering whos is Bernard B Kerik.
He is the 40th Police Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, and NY Times bestselling author.
Not completely unparalleled. The Hayes-Tilden election of 1876 had similar activity.
Kek
I REMEMBER HIM.
Isn’t the whole exercise by these states moot with this news? :
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3915450/posts
ELECTORAL COLLEGE HANDS WHITE HOUSE TO BIDEN.
Not hardly.
Did the MI Electors actually get voted? The Collaborator House Speaker vowed to stop it from happening by working with his best friend Gov Witless.
Unfortunately somebody in my home has fox news on. They just announced that the electors were chosen for Biden. Never said a word about the alternate electors being selected for Trump. They wonder why their ratings are in the tank.
No.
RE: No.
OK, I like your succinct answer, but maybe you could educate us a bit by ELABORATING AS TO WHY ‘NO’. Thanks.
There have already been about a dozen posts today about this HISTORIC AND UNPARALLELED thing. Which isn’t actually a thing. It would be like the Democratic electors in Texas and Florida meeting to cast their votes for Biden. It doesn’t mean squat, because these aren’t the electors certified by their respective states.
excellent
“I REMEMBER HIM.”
Hayes or Tilden?
And so now what happens when it is proven conclusively that the democrats cheated badly, now that Biden has been declared the winner by the electoral college and it will?
EO 13848
Elaboration not needed as it has been discussed ad infinitum already. Who cares what the corrupticrats and corruptipubs do...
A corrupt former NYC commissioner. If I recall correctly, he wasn’t clean and had disreputable association and profiting schilling TSA scanners.
3 U.S. Code § 5. Determination of controversy as to appointment of electorsIf any State shall have provided, by laws enacted prior to the day fixed for the appointment of the electors, for its final determination of any controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, by judicial or other methods or procedures, and such determination shall have been made at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, such determination made pursuant to such law so existing on said day, and made at least six days prior to said time of meeting of the electors, shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution, and as hereinafter regulated, so far as the ascertainment of the electors appointed by such State is concerned.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 673.)
My understanding is that these elections have lots of parallels. All kind of weird things happened, most historians think that it was also stolen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.