Posted on 11/08/2020 8:04:58 PM PST by Sense
In this youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be
Host L Todd Wood reveals the mechanics behind the electronic vote steal operation in an interview with powerful source.
Demanding election integrity, or... “undermining faith in democracy” ?
Federal Judge accuses Sidney Powell of “undermining faith in democracy”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913029/posts
I’ve not read the opinion.... but, posted in case you thought I was making things up... in relation to the conspiracy of silence that is operating in BOTH PARTIES to facilitate and protect election fraud.
Do you want elections that “appear to be” legitimate... only because FEDERAL JUDGES advocate looking the other way... or do you want elections that ARE LEGITIMATE.
This IS THE FIGHT... that matters most.
Force them to quit hiding the FACT of fraud under the pretense of “protecting democracy” by enabling fraud.
I want to be painfully clear...
The way the fraud operates... is by FIRST convincing good people in both parties... that the ILLUSION of integrity is far more important than the FACT of integrity.
That happens DAY ONE on the job for new politicians. They are TOLD on day one... ALL OF THEM... that both parties have agreed to avoid the topic of fraud, because it breeds mistrust... and they need to ensure people have confidence in the system, for the system to continue working.
That is a lie. It is THE lie. Maybe it seems a small thing, but that’s the BIG LIE that enables the others. That’s the one lie being tolerated, that enables the rest to occur in darkness, enabling their systemic fraud to rule us.
What the system needs is ACTUAL integrity and not the illusion of it ? ACTUAL integrity, will have no reason to fear “unfounded” claims... but it will instead encourage them and provide REAL transparency as a proper check on the POTENTIAL that suppression of concern will enable fraud.
Sidney should prosecute the Michigan case to the next level... with a focus on drawing in and exposing the Judge for demanding tolerance of fraud as the necessary condition for “defending democracy”...
The SCOTUS case... should make the point clearly in ruling... that integrity, not the illusion of it, is the goal.
It SCOTUS clearly makes that point... it will derail the fraud AT THE SOURCE by preventing the lie from ever infecting the body politic at the outset... as it does now.
bttt
Posting this to better develop the context re the post to which it replies, a short one, so re-posted in full here:
Dominion Received $400 Million from Chinese Communist Party Bank Account
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3911921/posts
To put it in context, here’s a link to the text of EO 13848:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018-20203/imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election
But, here’s another link that’s a bit more fun to read, while it also adds a bit more context to the context, linking to the history of the EO’s in the Obama era:
https://spookdblog.blogspot.com/2020/11/trumps-executive-order-13848.html?m=1
Want more recent context with amplification ?
Trump prefers extemporaneous speaking. He rambles, adds asides at random... and enjoys chatting with the audience while speaking. But, when he recently gave “the most important speech of my life”... it was a speech. It was prepared ahead of time, and it was delivered by being read... AS WRITTEN... word for word. Why ?
The speech discussing the issue of election fraud is said to have been prepared by the White House lawyers ? And it contains very SPECIFIC language, including elements that were taken VERBATIM from EO13848 ?
Here’s a fun look at it:
https://richardsonpost.com/howellwoltz/19243/did-president-trump-just-go-nuclear/
Today... master of understatement that he is... Trump said “Big things are coming in the next few days.” The SCOTUS likely acts, tomorrow... but I don’t think that’s what he was talking about ?
Re-reading the speech in context of EO 13848:
Full text here:
Laches ? We don’t need no stinking Laches...
Rino-Rats Out Themselves in PA Amicus
The arguments are fatuous... leaving the primary point being who signed up to it: John Danforth, Christine Todd Whitman, Lowell Weicker...
An obvious ploy...
One of the difficulties in addressing the practice of fraud in the 2020 election, if you do agree to ignore the obvious in the coordination that had to occur to magically enable officials in 5 different states, and multiple but only particular counties within them, to alter election procedures in exactly the same way... at the same time... in multiple instances... with each exercise having the same bias in influence...
By not practicing “a fraud” but distributing the effort into a massive aggregation of many frauds... they seek to ensure that being caught in any one of them will enable the argument “yeah, but it wasn’t enough to change the outcome, so you should ignore it”.
See for instance the first paragraph in Boockvar’s BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-542/162063/20201130140620945_RPP%20Opp%20Cert%20v.FINAL.pdf
Before the 2020 Presidential election—in light of the exigencies induced by the COVID-19 pandemic and slowdownsin the operation of the United States Postal Service—the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the Pennsylvania Constitution requireda one-time, three-day extension of the “received-by” date for mail-in ballots.Fewer than 10,000 ballots were received dur-ing those three days. Pennsylvania has since certified its election results. There is no federal election in Penn-sylvania whose outcome would be altered if those bal-lots were counted.
Bookmark
The Texas Filing in TX v PA
Try that again:
The TX filing in TX v PA
Yeah, that’s better...
Pennsylvania’s filing in response to TX seems it has not yet made it into the SCOTUS computers...
Noted, however, this youtube by HA Goodman addressing it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0POqNPyE4E
At 1:50 into the vid:
“The State of Pennsylvania gave their rebuttal to the Supreme Court and it basically said... “That, well, uh... we’re not saying that no fraud took place, but, uh... if you rule in favor of Trump then people won’t trust our elections any more. Guess what, Pennsylvania and Democrats, nobody trusts you. And nobody trusts the fact that President Trump was dominating on election day and just miraculously lost, even though”...
Thanks, Texas...
For getting Pennsylvania to INTRODUCE the subject, for proper consideration by the court, enabling them to judge the argument re the value of the ILLUSION of integrity... versus the law imposing an actual requirement for it...
The SCOTUS ruling that the law demands the FACT of integrity, while the Justices refuse feigning obeisance to the mantra that we have to PRETEND it exists...
The SCOTUS, rather, by REFUSING that fraud overtly, themselves, while also acting as deliberately as possible in denying that refuge of scoundrels to others...
That is the one essential element in the real world, that is necessary to enable rooting out fraud at the origin.
The left is DEPENDING on others sustained reliance on the indoctrinated mantra: that it is the PERCEPTION of integrity that is the essential touchstone... and that we cannot allow or tolerate anyone disrupting that perception... even when the FACTS require admitting that the frauds practiced overwhelms and dominates not just outcomes, but any persons in the system who still do retain a shred of integrity.
You have to be a liar to be admitted to the club.
Here’s Pennsylvania... asking the SCOTUS to kiss the blarney stone... to perpetuate that requirement.
Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blarney_Stone
The Blarney Stone (Irish: Cloch na Blarnan) is a block of Carboniferous limestone[1] built into the battlements of Blarney Castle, Blarney, about 8 kilometres (5 miles) from Cork, Ireland. According to legend, kissing the stone endows the kisser with the gift of the gab (great eloquence or skill at flattery). The stone was set into a tower of the castle in 1446. The castle is a popular tourist site in Ireland, attracting visitors from all over the world to kiss the stone and tour the castle and its gardens.
The word blarney has come to mean “clever, flattering, or coaxing talk”. Irish politician John O’Connor Power defined it this way: “Blarney is something more than mere flattery. It is flattery sweetened by humour and flavoured by wit. Those who mix with Irish folk have many examples of it in their everyday experience.
Truth will out:
Georgia governor warns state lawmakers they cannot choose Trump electors
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3913396/posts?page=8
Most interesting is the massive shift apparent in the bias in the posters comments... compared with what was being posted here two or three weeks ago... showing that a wide majority of Freepers not only “get it”... but that there is a tremendous amount of energy in the argument... more than a little anger... and perhaps most importantly in regard to implications in tipping points... an already large and accelerating tendency to respond with DERISION...
Laughing at them... is the worst insult... and a clear tell in a final proof that they’ve lost the argument...
Meanwhile, the desperate attempts to denigrate the effort with humor from the left... whiff... fall flat... add fuel to the fire. True of the election issues, with SNL’s efforts mocking those who signed sworn affidavits failing to make an impact... and true of SNL versus the Virus issues:
STATEN ISLAND ACTIVIST UNLOADS ON SNL’S PETE DAVIDSON MOCKING ANTI-SHUTDOWN PROTESTERS
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3913387/posts
Throw in awareness, across the entire spectrum of conflict, exposing how the media are lying to us about EVERYTHING ?
The Staten Island bar story... wheeled a few days ago, with MSM blasting the news that the owner fled from police, and then assaulted a police officer with his car...
Watch this:
Staten Island pub owner holds press conference in front of his bar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94itzKrh-U4
Republican politicans may not have a spine, but the American people are discovering that the people have one...
Many are clearly already aware the virus “management” effort seems it fits “hand in glove” with the Democrats electoral strategy... including that decisions to lock down often appear more related to shifting tides in politics more than to shifting risks in reality... while many now suspect that the evidence in correlation between Democrats with China’s interest is not accidental...
Less commonly noted... my focus here... is the parallel result in an emerging “equal but opposite” impact:
Its time for mass civil disobedience against lawless lockdown orders
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913384/posts
Under threat of civil war:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3913382/posts
Impacts extend to alternative health care awareness:
Feedback needed from those taking Quercitin/D3/Zinc/K2/NAC/C as a preventative against COVID-19. -Please.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3913332/posts
Much more on FR with search if you want to see more...
My point is... there are parallel wake-up calls occurring... the virus, the news, the election...
And, not shockingly, one of the impacts is that people ARE being woken up... are then they are finding more than one reason exists to become angry and active...
What I’m addressing here... is the awareness that the reality is... deliberately having fun with it and mocking the other side for their blindness... only adds to the weight of the argument...
Fast Forward: TX gets SCOTUS nod...
Supreme Court Formally Dockets Texas Election Case Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania And Wisconsin
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3913477/posts
The left threatens violence if they don’t get their way:
PA filing extract:
https://media.thedonald.win/post/WJrd3Z0h.jpeg
From:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlTouHxc/from-the-pa-filing-today-pa-is-p/c/
Report: Georgia Republican Legislators Fear ANTIFA and BLM Will Burn Down Atlanta if they Don’t Allow Biden’s Fraudulent Win to Stand
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3913457/posts
Facilitating Fraud by Refusing To Talk About It ?
The voluntary conspiracy of silence is not working.
So, now they’re having to go a step beyond. Not trusting in passive social coercion, it is now made overt: if you even discuss fraud, you will be blacklisted.
Monopoly Google’s Monopoly Video Platform YouTube Sends Out a Warning to All YouTubers: If You Even Discuss Election Fraud, We Will Ban You From the Platform
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3913814/posts
You might find this relevant here;
Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed
https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html
Part of the Summary Description at Video link;
Quote
“That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.
10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).”
Watch at 8:00m, 22:00m, 27:00, for about 3 to 4 minutes to get some big ideas,
Other highlight points in the video;
42:00m Summarizes how the algorithm works
66:00m Real Evidence about 6 to 8 minutes long
88:30m Reverse engineering the wheel
105:00m Well balanced wheel
106:00m More evidence as wheel folds in like a fan
134:30m The tree re-balancing may be related to the roll back of votes counts seen
139:00m Summation formula of splitting the load between precincts
140:00 The wheel number
His data shows a software ability to set a ratio and then transferring it between precincts.
https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html
Quote “The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.”
Which also dovetails with Piton’s Phantom Sleeper Voters being injected;
https://twitter.com/BobbyPiton3/status/1336323965493465093
Quote “I have figured out an algorithm of how #PhantomSleeperVoters are created in the data. Based on results in AZ and soon... other States... this will be proved out across US!”
Original Jurisdiction...
https://www.fjc.gov/history/courts/jurisdiction-original-supreme-court
Keywords: serious, appropriate, substantial
Trump, if he intervenes, should do so as the President of the United States, advocating for the people and the Office of the President, and to ensure the laws are faithfully executed, and not as “the Trump campaign”. The critical issue is not about the outcome of the election, but about its conduct being compliant with law, or not. Participation by the campaign might derail the effort by tainting the issue of appropriateness... making it appear the court is engaged to choose a winner in an election... rather than resolve issues in law.
Obviously, were Texas to amend the suit to also incorporate complaints against foreign actors, that may have impact, and enable others in joining... only when the cause for that expanded participation is made clear.
A suit arising between states does not guarantee a case will be heard... but muddling the controversy between states by adding non-state actors as participants is an obvious risk:
“Beginning with Cohens v. Virginia in 1821, the Court held that its original jurisdiction was defined entirely by the nature of the parties to a suit, not the subject matter. The Court declined to hear in the first instance cases under the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States unless they strictly conformed to one of the state party suits specified in the Constitution: a suit between two or more states, between a state as plaintiff and citizens of another state, and between a state as plaintiff and foreign citizens or governments.
“The Supreme Court established an important exception to this rule when it held that the Court would hear original suits brought by the United States against a state. In the 1892 case of United States v. Texas , Justice John Marshall Harlan ruled that since the federal judicial power extended to “cases in which the United States was a party,” and the Court was granted jurisdiction over cases to which a state was a party, the Court would take jurisdiction in a United States suit against a state. Such suits by the United States increased after the 1890s and usually involved disputes with states over land, though in the late twentieth century they also included a few suits to enforce provisions of the Federal Voting Rights Act.”
Democrats Failure to Understand Bush v Gore
Upton Sinclair: “It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.”
What 2000 Bush v. Gore Decision Teaches Us
https://www.theleaflet.in/what-2000-bush-v-gore-decision-teaches-us/#
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
