Were there really "battleground" states" all along? (Vanity)

11/8/20 | Self

[Ebenezer]

All of us remember how, during this past presidential campaign, along with the bogus polls, the media were constantly touting all this about "battleground" states in the electoral map. You have to wonder, though, if these were all states Trump was poised to carry all along, perhaps by narrow margins, but fabricated by the media narrative as "battleground" as a cue to Democrats on where election fraud may actually work on Biden's favor.

Efforts at vote-rigging in many states would have been a waste of time for the Democratic machines. For example, the Deep South was undeniably Trump country, and New England was undeniably Biden country, so the election fraud had to be planned where Biden was not looking good but enough fraud would take him over the top.

Just sayin'.

[Ebenezer]

This time around, the Democrats crunched their numbers and knew in which states there were going to “intervene”. They were not going to repeat 2016.

[boxlunch]

Texas also carefully vetted its election machinery and processes. They refused to use some of the software and hardware that was approved in the so called “battleground states“, because security experts believed there were issues.

[LS]

Even with that, the margin in TX was only about 600,000.
Should be double that.

[reasonisfaith]

No, they didn’t.

Go to link on this post:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3903648/posts?page=16#16

[higgmeister]

With Biden’s history of plagiarizing other politicians, telling exaggerated lies about his education and background, and pay-to-play extortion, faking ballots was just a small step in his life long fake existence.

[Ebenezer]

This may already be going on without our knowledge, but while they’re at it, Trump’s support team should look for incriminating e-mails, telephone calls, and Project Veritas-style videos showing the fraud plans in progress.

[reasonisfaith]

To post # 23 here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3903666/posts?page=23#23

[Ebenezer]

Yes, the Texas victory was too close for comfort. That is one state the Democrats will desperately try to take in 2024. The warning is out.

[meadsjn]

Were there really "battleground" states" all along? (Vanity)

Did you see more than 100 or 200 people at any Biden rally, or more than a dozen at a Kamala rally?

Did you see more than 2 or 3 thousand people at EVERY RALLY COMBINED for Pedo Joe and the Ho?

No, never did.

[Jamestown1630]

Well, they didn’t have anywhere near the numbers in favor of them that Trump did; and they KNEW that.

At the same time, they thought that they didn’t have to pull out the kind of effort that the President did - they thought they had it in the bag through fraud.

If any sane person viewed the tens of thousands of people who attended rally after rally for Trump - as opposed to the paltry few that Biden/Harris ever drew - they will see clearly that something stinks mightily in the Democrat party.

[WildHighlander57]

https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325143724687388672

Start here and see the next 6 tweets:

Where this is headed:
12:30 PM · Nov 7, 2020·Twitter Web App
408
Retweets
7
Quote Tweets
2.7K
Likes
CulturalHusbandry
@APhilosophae
·
Nov 7
Replying to
@APhilosophae
At this point you are just moving the line back as far as you can towards Dec. 14.
If you can do it without a state of emergency, then better.
If not, you call the emergency powers into play and designate Chinese interference into the election
CulturalHusbandry
@APhilosophae
·
Nov 7
>Joe’s low opposition to China, Trump’s anti-China streak, Trump killing the TPP, and the Hunter Biden laptop scenario all help correlate to this move
Trump tells the DOJ to investigate and they will due to a recent Barr precedent.
CulturalHusbandry
@APhilosophae
·
Nov 7
The repubs in the states in question can refuse to hand over until after the DOJ Investigation.
Sure dems can challenge but it will just go to the Supreme Court.
Legislature supports all these moves of stalling (including emergency powers if it comes to that but probably won’t).
CulturalHusbandry
@APhilosophae
·
Nov 7
Dec. 14 rolls by and the vote goes to the house.
Each house rep gets 1 vote.
Repubs have 26, Dems at 23. Even if they hold all 2018 wins, and gain Pennsylvania seat, they still end up at 26 vs. 24. 25 with Georgia iirc.

Repubs vote Trump.

2nd term for Trump.
CulturalHusbandry
@APhilosophae
·
Nov 7
Meanwhile the Media has primed the populace for “Trump stealing the Presidency”.
So you get even more riots. Potentially much more violent ones.
CulturalHusbandry
@APhilosophae
·
Nov 7
The question that remains is, does anyone care enough about the presidency, to risk the riots?

The answer is, of course, yes as we’ve seen factions nationwide riot over far less.

[boxlunch]

Yes, and that is concerning!

[SkyPilot]

Any hope that the courts will overturn this fraud?

[LS]

No. Maybe in PA, but only the counting of the “sequestered” ballots. If it can be proven Biteme “won” without those, irrelevant and the court won’t hear it.

[SkyPilot]

Thanks for the honest answer. Seems pretty grim, but it is what it is.

[BagCamAddict]

I agree with your premise. And I agree that Dems focused their fraud on those states.

I don’t want to tell them how to commit fraud better next time, but...

The fact that Trump improved upon his 2016 New York performance by 8.5 points is significant. There’s no way Trump closed the gap in NY by 8.5 points but lost ground in WI, MI, PA, AZ, GA, NC.

IMHO

[karnage]

Thanks for this valuable information, LS.

[GOPsterinMA]

The comeback starts today. This will be the 2nd best return ever behind Jesus

[LS]

PA House, MI House at least looking; Trump suit “looks” good but I’m no lawyer.

AZ doable if 50,000 still outstanding down 15,000. If it’s only 40,000, I don’t see Trump getting there. That would require a couple of “Bullhead City” drops.

[GOPsterinMA]

God’s taking care of this.