I have to say though, that I’ve heard arguments in both directions about the watermarks. Some say they exist; other say they don’t. Some say they don’t matter or can’t prove anything. We’ll see what happens ... as POTUS would say.
*********************************************************************************
Who ever says that the watermarks don’t exist is dead wrong. Beyond that things are debatable. Click the link below and go to the bottom of the chart. You will see the description of the watermark. It’s official according to the CISA.
Wander around that site-this is the agency that was set up to secure our elections. Lots of stuff there to learn.
Guy has interesting theory — Says POTUS won overwhelming victory. He won Florida by 400 thousand votes. He got about 200 thousand more than last time in Miami Dade. Biden in Santa Rosa did about 50% better than HRC.
He has a theory about the ballot stuffing happening in Republic Can districts —Trump won to big to just stuff the Dem districts-If I understand it.
Just a weird guy, but I had not heard about how big Florida win was-cause the focus went so quick to Arizona and the bogus early call.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSuFRLEYbDg&feature=emb_logo
What the CISA spokesperson is attributed as saying seems very superficially to disagree with PDJT, but the statement doesn't really seem to get anywhere near "debunking," which requires sound refutation of a claim through a logical presentation of contrary facts, IMHO.
NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT'S COMING! (Q#4684) (Certainly not this milquetoast article.)