I just listened to it.
Using lawyer-eaze there is more than one way to interpret this...
What she can actually prove is going to be very interesting.
She may be able to prove and document XYZ happened in XYZ order.
Whether she can prove it was the result of Hammer and Scorecard is debatable.
This is a State Secret level of program.
Going to be very interesting.
I don’t think she is going to have a State Secret level of proof without a whistleblower. And if she does have a whistleblower then it all gets put under cover of State Secrets and not sure we are going to hear any of it.
Can hardly be considered a state secret if the DNC is deploying it across 30 states.
I just had a thought: I wonder if the voting machine co would be the whistleblower. they don’t want their name tarnished as I don’t think they’re in on it. Could be wrong but that would be a good source.