Posted on 11/06/2020 8:25:02 AM PST by LeonardFMason
The Supreme Court will be loathe to choose a winner and loser in this election.
They DON'T have to.
FOLLOW THE LAW can be their CONSTITUTIONAL Default.
If Governors and Courts unilaterally changed the LAW in a state, the SCOTUS should find this "REWRITE of ELECTION LAWS INVALID".
Remedy(Without calling Winner or Loser):
The Vote Count that matches the EXISTING Law is valid. ANY votes counted as a result of a unilateral and illegal changes to the existing Election Law of the state are invalidated.
The option available to these States is to accept this ruling OR conduct ANOTHER Election following state law.
THIS APPROACH allows the SCOTUS to FOLLOW THE LAW and NOT pick a winner.
A NATIONWIDE revote would not be necessary. Just the states where Election Laws were changed.
Seems like everyone on this site has thrown in the towel. But maybe I remain optimistic foolishly. There is obviously fraud going on in PA and Michigan.
I haven’t thrown in the towel.
I don’t know about necessary, but I’d prefer a nationwide revote.
I guarandamntee that the fraud occurred in more than just a handful of states.
The Supreme Court can simply rule that the legislatures of each state will determine which slate of electors will be sent to the Electoral College vote in December. That’s what the Constitution says is the process to be followed.
& which state legislatures have the balls to fight back?
To further this doctrine, no law impacting elections should be allowed to take effect without sufficient time for the parties to prepare. I recommend 6 months.
So SCOTUS could simply say, the laws that were in effect x months (I beleive 6 is appropriate) PRIOR to the election, shall be the legal threashold for determinging if a vote / ballot is legal or illegal.
I also believe that SCOTUS should rule that any precienct that can not seperate the illegal votes should not be included in the election results. I.e. posion apples spoil the batch.
I’d love a revote as well in any state where fraud obviously occurred.
Realistically, all passions aside - that ain’t EVER gonna happen.
ZERO.
That’s not the Supreme Court’s problem — is it?
First, no court can order a revote, so that won’t happen.
Second, all the states except PA had laws that permitted the fraud, including AZ and NV.
Third, GA was just handed to Biteme. A recount won’t change that.
Fourth, the courts aren’t the issue here. It is the state legislators that submit a slate of electors. THEY are the ones to worry about. There is no evidence they are ready to resist the Hoax Media terror that will be unleashed on them if they invalidate the fraudulent counts.
What the hell are you talking about?
It’s understandable the SCOTUS hates getting involved in elections... but now they MUST!!! To save their own court from being destroyed by “packing.” Hopefully the left leaning justices and John “Quisling” Roberts will also realize the critical necessity to so!
#SaveTheRepublic!
I haven’t thrown in the towel. Just waiting to be instructed what to do.
Problem now is that all the votes that have been counted: during and after election day ... have been comingled and can not be separated.
There needs to be a new election in the affected states with in-person voting ONLY! No mail in ballots.
At least six states sent out unsolicited ballots to their voting age citizens (not registered voters) totaling 44+ million ballots (according to Reuters). But not all states did so. Therefore the citizens of the states that did enjoyed an unequal advantage over those that didn’t in violation of the equal protection clause of the Constitution and their votes should be disqualified.
Maybe they use the totals from election day only then. Not sure .
We need everyone to get on the same page.
There are only 3 paths forward.
1. The Gingrich Plan
2. The Levin Plan
3. Both
There is 100% irrefutable evidence of election fraud. This cannot be refuted.
State law says the both R and D observers must be allowed to observe the vote counting. If for even 1 minute, they were prevented from observing the vote count, then ALL of the ballots which could even theoretically have been affected should now be considered INVALID. There is no way to restore the legitimacy of those ballots after being removed from the proscribed protections of the state election laws.
Either we go with the Gingrich plan and argue in court that all ballots from the offending precincts are now invalid....
OR
We go with the Levin plan and tell the state legislatures they need to pick the electors for their state...
OR
Both.
This is the only way forward.
Agreed, mewzilla ... the fraud occurred in more than a few states.
We seem stuck on the handful of battleground states still undecided but I suspect there are many more states where the fraud worked better and quicker than they imagined.
Some states are hopeless, of course. My home state of Massachusetts was lost decades ago, not in 2020, so I have minimal voice.
But how many states could have gone “red” if not for a few percentage points? Instead of calling for recounts in a few, maybe we should demand a legal look at all but the most hopeless blue wastelands.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.