Posted on 11/05/2020 5:51:50 PM PST by OL Hickory
You are post #3 and got to call it a hoax didn’t you?
So what do you make of this?
Posting this showing they planed this for a while
33 states accepted DHS aid to secure elections (2017)
https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/344981-33-states-accepted-dhs-aid-to-secure-elections
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3902362/posts?page=43#43
It’s amazing like Reagan said “It’s not so much what liberals don’t know, it’s how much they know that isn’t so!”
While there may not be an ‘official’ federal watermark for the ballots. There is certainly a real watermark created on each paper printed created by the printer. This is designed to tell which printer any sheet of printed paper came from. It has been used countless times as evidence in multiple crimes.
That’s how they got the anti-Trump translator with the silly name, Reality Winner.
She totally missed the watermark. The watermark is NOT dots!
That’s right! Forgot about that.
Wouldn’t the fraudster know that can fake that too? Besides, there must be thousands of vendors that supply ballots around the country.
It would be super cool if there was some secret mechanism to catch fraudulent ballots after the fact. That would be epic.
The way to read a watermark is to hold it up to the light; you don't need a loupe.
Other than that, I hope it's true. I hope there are watermarks to identify legitimate and illegitimate ballots.
When does the DoJ seize the ballots to check them? Tomorrow with the free beer?
That particular operation, the printing was done with silicone plates?
The “Official Ballot” watermark is embedded into the paper fibers during the paper making process provides clarity that cannot be duplicated by any other method. Secure Ballot Stock is available exclusively from Hart InterCivic, and is sold only to Hart’s customers or preferred printers, to prevent unauthorized ballot replication.
https://sos.idaho.gov/elect/Clerk/Hart/Verity/Hart_Secure_Ballot_Stock_Specification_4005526_A00.pdf
I imagine other states might have similar requirements?
I don’t know if this is right or not but this Dr. Steve Pieczenick is in an interview seems like he might know what he is talking about.
The overall story is that Trump got watermarks and block chain encyption codes on all the ballots.
Seems like it would be hard to do but some have said that these are printed at 2 or 3 different places and sent to all the state, so it might be possible.
Anyone else heard this?
https://2020electioncenter.com/watch?id=5fa480cc65f2d419a08b54e2
You would probably remember that a ‘watermark’ is put into the paper as it is manufactured from the pulp. These folks seem to be referring to a tamper-revealing ink printing added later in the manufacturing process. ....Another printer, whodafugdathunkit? Good to ‘meet’ you....guess I’ll be minding my ‘p’s and ‘q’s a mite closer now. ;)
I don’t know if this is right or not but this Dr. Steve Pieczenick is in an interview seems like he might know what he is talking about.
The overall story is that Trump got watermarks and block chain encyption codes on all the ballots.
Seems like it would be hard to do but some have said that these are printed at 2 or 3 different places and sent to all the state, so it might be possible.
Anyone else heard this?
https://2020electioncenter.com/watch?id=5fa480cc65f2d419a08b54e2
Yes, I’ve heard it-about the sting and the paper. Hope it’s true, and not an urban legend. Nothing for sure yet.
My Democrat co worker pointed out the small emblem above where we initialed. She even got magnifying glass and we looked at it. It was suggested by another worker that it looked like a watermark. It HAD NOT been on ballots in previous elections.
The watermark used is said to be blockchain. That would be very hard to fake.
Gosh....everyone’s asleep, on this thread.
Bump
smokingfrog wrote:
“The “Official Ballot” watermark is embedded into the paper fibers during the paper making process provides clarity that cannot be duplicated by any other method. Secure Ballot Stock is available exclusively from Hart InterCivic, and is sold only to Hart’s customers or preferred printers, to prevent unauthorized ballot replication.
https://sos.idaho.gov/elect/Clerk/Hart/Verity/Hart_Secure_Ballot_Stock_Specification_4005526_A00.pdf
I imagine other states might have similar requirements?”
Thanks for this info!
Interesting. This was in 2018.
FTA:
‘Nielsen told a group of reporters touring the Department of Homeland Security’s National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC) in Arlington, Va., that she wants “all state and local election officials to make certain that by the 2020 presidential election, every American votes on a verifiable and auditable ballot.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.